Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07929896
CompletedNCT07929896ClinicalTrials.gov record

Evaluation Of New Shape of 3D Bone Plate in the Treatment of Posterior Mandibular Fractures

Posterior Mandibular Fractures Involving the Body or Angle Region

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Age range
18 years - 60 years
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Participants
20 Actual

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

comparing new design of 3D titanium bone plate with less number of screws with conventional two miniplates in the treatment of posterior mandibular fractures involving the body or angle region

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years old.
  • Adult patients of both genders.
  • Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I.
  • Patients presenting with simple unilateral posterior mandibular fractures involving the mandibular body or angle requiring open reduction and internal fixation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • ASA II,III,IV
  • Patients with associated maxillofacial injuries that may interfere with study outcomes.
  • Patients with comminuted mandibular fractures that requires reconstruction plate
  • Patients with infected fractures.
  • Patients with pathological fractures
Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
Single masked
Pin Buckle (study) group

ten patients with posterior mandibular fractures involving the body or angle region, were treated with pin buckle bone plate

Procedure: ORIF using Pin Buckle bone plate

conventional two miniplates (control) group

ten patients with posterior mandibular fractures involving the body or angle region, were treated with conventional two miniplates

Procedure: ORIF using conventional two miniplates

ORIF using Pin Buckle bone plate PROCEDURE

open reduction and internal fixation

ORIF using conventional two miniplates PROCEDURE

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

Change in Radiographic Fracture-Line Width

Time frame: Immediately postoperatively (baseline), 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

The width of the fracture line will be measured in millimeters using DIGORA image analysis software on standardized digital panoramic radiographs. Measurements will be performed at three standardized points (superior, middle, and inferior) along the visible fracture line, and the mean value will be calculated. Changes from baseline will be assessed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and compared between the study and control groups.

Secondary measures

Change in Radiographic Bone Density at the Fracture Site

Time frame: Immediately postoperatively (baseline), 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

Radiographic bone healing will be assessed by measuring the mean grayscale value at the fracture site using DIGORA image analysis software on standardized digital panoramic radiographs. Measurements will be performed using a standardized region of interest (ROI) at the immediate postoperative baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The change in mean grayscale values from baseline to 3 and 6 months will be evaluated and compared between the study and control groups.

Postoperative Pain Intensity

Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 7, and 14.

Postoperative pain intensity will be evaluated using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Patients will be asked to indicate their pain intensity at each follow-up assessment. Pain scores will be compared between the study and control groups.

Postoperative Facial Edema

Time frame: Preoperatively (baseline) and postoperative days 1, 7, and 14.

Facial edema will be assessed using standardized tape measurements between two anatomical landmarks: the tragus and corner of the mouth, and the lateral canthus and gonion. The sum of the two measurements will be calculated. Changes in the summed measurements relative to the preoperative baseline will be used to evaluate postoperative facial edema and compared between the study and control groups.

Postoperative Wound Healing

Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 7, and 14.

Wound healing will be evaluated clinically using a structured scoring system consisting of five parameters: wound size reduction, tissue appearance, wound exudate, pain and inflammatory response, and mucosal integrity. Each parameter will be scored from 0 (poor) to 2 (good), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better wound healing. Total wound healing scores will be compared between the study and control groups.

Clinical Stability of Fracture Segments

Time frame: Immediately postoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

Fracture stability will be assessed by bimanual digital palpation to detect mobility between fracture segments during functional mandibular movements and manual manipulation. Fractures will be classified as stable (absence of detectable movement) or unstable (presence of detectable movement). The proportion of stable fractures will be compared between the study and control groups.

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (1)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

1 locations

Faculty of Dentistry / Suez Canal UniversityIsmailia, Ismailia Governorate, EgyptStatus unknown

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
Suez Canal University
Study start
Jul 18, 2025 Actual
Primary completion
Mar 10, 2026 Actual
Study completion
Sep 10, 2026 Actual
First posted
Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.

Official study title

Clinical And Radiographic Evaluation Of Pin Buckle Bone Plate in the Treatment of Posterior Mandibular Fractures: A Randomized Study

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026