Disability and Psychological Symptoms After Injection or Conservative Care for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation · Lumbar Radiculopathy
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- Not applicable / not listed
- Age range
- 18 years - Not specified
- Sex eligible
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers
- Not reported
- Participants
- 64 Actual
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
Lumbar disc herniation can cause leg pain, difficulty with daily activities, and symptoms of depression or anxiety. This completed study compared disability and psychological symptom scores in patients who chose an image-guided injection with those who continued conservative care. Sixty-four patients at Tiemenguan People's Hospital were included in the analytical cohort, with 32 in each group. Treatment was chosen through patient preference and discussion with clinicians. Disability, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms were assessed before treatment and at a nominal three-month follow-up. Pain was recorded before and immediately after the first treatment session. The study examined whether the two treatment groups had different three-month scores. The comparison is observational and cannot establish that treatment caused the differences. This record is prepared after data collection; outcome ordering was determined after data collection.
Read the full description
This was an exploratory, single-center, prospective, nonrandomized observational cohort at Tiemenguan People's Hospital, Tiemenguan, Xinjiang, China. The manuscript reports a study period from January 2021 to August 2024. Participants had single-level lumbar disc herniation with corresponding unilateral radicular symptoms, persistent symptoms despite at least three months of conservative treatment, and baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 5 to 14 each.
Treatment selection followed patient preference and shared decision-making rather than protocol-assigned allocation. The initial exposures were a fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection package using reverse geometric planning, lidocaine, and compound betamethasone, or continued conservative care with celecoxib, infrared physical therapy, and home rehabilitation guidance. Subsequent adherence, treatment crossover, rescue analgesia, and other care were not quantified.
The analytical cohort comprised 64 unique patients with paired baseline and nominal three-month disability and psychological symptom scores. The screening denominator, individual exclusion counts, and attrition before inclusion in this dataset were unavailable. The source sampling procedure was not sufficiently documented to establish random or consecutive sampling. Three-month outcome assessors were blinded to treatment group; patients and treating clinicians were not blinded.
The principal analysis compared three-month ODI, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 totals using separate linear models adjusted for the corresponding baseline score, age, and sex. HC3 robust standard errors and Holm correction across the three outcomes were used. Immediate VAS pain scores and injection procedural records were descriptive. Threshold-response and pain-psychological-change association analyses were exploratory.
This completed study is being registered after data collection. A prospectively dated protocol and analysis plan were unavailable. Outcome ordering and statistical specifications were defined after data collection. ODI is placed in the primary-outcome field and PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in secondary-outcome fields to describe the manuscript's post hoc ordering, without implying prospective prespecification. Follow-up was nominally three months; exact assessment dates and a verified visit window were unavailable. Pain was not measured at three months. Structured adverse-event surveillance was unavailable, so adverse-event rates and comparative safety were not estimated.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unilateral lower-extremity radicular symptoms corresponding to MRI evidence of single-level lumbar disc herniation.
- Failure of conservative treatment for at least three months.
- Baseline PHQ-9 total score from 5 to 14 and baseline GAD-7 total score from 5 to 14.
- Written informed consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe spinal stenosis.
- Lumbar instability.
- Previous lumbar surgery.
- Severe psychiatric illness.
- Coagulation disorders.
- Local infection at the injection site.
Study population
Patients with MRI-confirmed single-level lumbar disc herniation and corresponding unilateral radicular symptoms treated at Tiemenguan People's Hospital, Tiemenguan, Xinjiang, China. The analytical cohort included 64 patients who selected injection or continued conservative care. The full screened population was not reported.
Understand screeningTreatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Not reported
- Masking
- Not reported
Image-guided injection group
Patients with lumbar disc herniation who selected a fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection package using reverse geometric planning, lidocaine, and compound betamethasone through shared decision-making. The analytical cohort included 32 patients in this group.
Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection with reverse geometric planning · Drug: Lidocaine · Drug: Compound betamethasone
Continued conservative care group
Patients with lumbar disc herniation who selected continued conservative care through shared decision-making. Initial care comprised celecoxib, local infrared physical therapy, and subsequent home rehabilitation guidance. The analytical cohort included 32 patients in this group.
Drug: Celecoxib · Other: Infrared physical therapy · Behavioral: Home rehabilitation guidance
Fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection with reverse geometric planning PROCEDURE
Anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy were used for surface projection and trajectory planning. A 22-gauge spinal needle was advanced toward the affected periradicular/epidural target under intermittent fluoroscopy and contrast observation. Iohexol 300 mg iodine/mL, 0.5 to 1.3 mL, was used to assess contrast spread before therapeutic injection.
Lidocaine DRUG
One mL of 1% lidocaine, equivalent to 10 mg, was included in the 2 mL therapeutic injectate. Local infiltration with 1% lidocaine preceded needle advancement; its volume was not recorded in the analytical dataset.
Compound betamethasone DRUG
One mL of compound betamethasone was included in the therapeutic injectate, containing 5 mg betamethasone as dipropionate and 2 mg betamethasone as sodium phosphate, totaling 7 mg betamethasone equivalents according to the product label.
Celecoxib DRUG
Celecoxib 200 mg orally once daily was prescribed as part of initial conservative care. The duration of subsequent medication use and actual adherence during follow-up were not quantified.
Infrared physical therapy OTHER
Local infrared physical therapy was prescribed once daily for two weeks.
Home rehabilitation guidance BEHAVIORAL
Home rehabilitation guidance followed initial conservative care. Exercise dose and actual rehabilitation adherence were not quantified.
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
Oswestry Disability Index score at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months after initial treatment
Total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at the nominal three-month follow-up, recorded as a percentage from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater disability. The registered metric is the absolute three-month total score. Baseline ODI was recorded for adjustment. Only final percentages were retained; item-level scores and the original scoring denominator were unavailable. The primary-outcome designation was assigned after data collection.
Secondary measures
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months after initial treatment
Total Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score at the nominal three-month follow-up, ranging from 0 to 27; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom burden. The registered metric is the absolute three-month total score. Baseline PHQ-9 was recorded for adjustment. Total scores do not establish a psychiatric diagnosis or remission. The secondary-outcome designation was assigned after data collection.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months after initial treatment
Total Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score at the nominal three-month follow-up, ranging from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom burden. The registered metric is the absolute three-month total score. Baseline GAD-7 was recorded for adjustment. Total scores do not establish a psychiatric diagnosis or remission. The secondary-outcome designation was assigned after data collection.
Other measures
Immediate visual analog scale pain score
Time frame: Immediately after the initial injection or initial conservative-care session
Self-rated pain score on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. The registered metric is the absolute immediate post-treatment total score. Pretreatment pain was also recorded as a reference. Immediate ratings followed the injection or the first conservative-care session and were descriptive. Exact elapsed minutes were unavailable. Pain was not measured at three months.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (1)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
1 locations
Hebei Medical University Third HospitalShijiazhuang, Hebei, ChinaStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
- Study start
- Jan 1, 2021 Actual
- Primary completion
- Aug 31, 2024 Actual
- Study completion
- Aug 31, 2024 Actual
- First posted
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
Three-Month Disability and Psychological Symptom Outcomes After Image-Guided Injection Versus Continued Conservative Care for Lumbar Disc Herniation: An Exploratory Nonrandomized Cohort Study
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
