Kegel vs. Reverse Kegel Exercises for Coccydynia
Coccydynia
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Age range
- 18 years - 50 years
- Sex eligible
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Participants
- 30 Estimated
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
This randomized clinical trial will compare the effects of Kegel and Reverse Kegel exercises on pain and functional disability in 30 patients with coccydynia aged 18-50 years. Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups, receiving their respective exercise protocols for 4 weeks, with three sessions per week. Outcomes will include pain intensity (NPRS), functional disability (ODI), and pain-free sitting duration, assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 24.
Read the full description
Coccydynia, commonly referred to as tailbone pain, is a painful condition localized to the coccyx that significantly impairs sitting tolerance, transitional movements, and quality of life. The condition is five times more prevalent in females due to anatomical differences and the effects of obstetric trauma. A key yet frequently overlooked contributor to coccydynia is pelvic floor muscle hypertonicity, in which the levator ani, coccygeus, and adjacent muscles exert chronic traction on the coccyx, perpetuating pain and functional disability. Physical therapy, particularly pelvic floor rehabilitation, has emerged as a cornerstone of conservative management. Kegel exercises, which involve concentric contraction of the pubococcygeus and levator ani muscles, strengthen the pelvic floor and improve structural support around the coccyx. Conversely, Reverse Kegel exercises emphasize eccentric lengthening and relaxation of the pelvic floor musculature, addressing the hypertonicity directly implicated in coccydynia. Despite growing evidence for both modalities, no randomized controlled trial to date has directly compared their effects on pain and functional disability in coccydynia patients.
This study will be a randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of Kegel exercises (Group A) versus Reverse Kegel exercises (Group B) on pain and functional disability in patients diagnosed with coccydynia. Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and pain-free sitting duration as a timed functional outcome measure. A sample of 30 patients (15 per group), aged 18-50 years, will be recruited using non-probability consecutive sampling and randomly allocated to groups. Both groups will receive their respective pelvic floor exercise protocols for 4 weeks (3 sessions per week, 12 sessions total). Outcome measures will be recorded at baseline, 2nd week, and 4th week. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 24.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-50 years, both genders. Confirmed diagnosis of coccydynia. Baseline NPRS score of 4-6. Symptoms persisting for ≥4 weeks. BMI \< 30 kg/m².
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous coccygeal or spinal surgery. Coccygeal fracture, tumor, or infection. Current pregnancy. Lower-limb neurological deficits. Pelvic organ prolapses or previous pelvic surgery. Corticosteroid injection within the past 3 months or concurrent pelvic/lumbar physiotherapy.
\-
Understand screeningTreatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Random assignment
- Masking
- Single masked
Kegel Exercises (Pelvic Floor Strengthening)
THIS GROUP will receive their respective exercise protocols over 4 weeks (3 sessions per week, 12 sessions total).
Other: KEGEL EXERCISES (Pelvic Floor Strengthening)
Reverse Kegel Exercises (Pelvic Floor Relaxation)
THIS group will receive their respective exercise protocols over 4 weeks (3 sessions per week, 12 sessions total).
Other: REVERSE KEGEL EXERCISES (Pelvic Floor Relaxation)
KEGEL EXERCISES (Pelvic Floor Strengthening) OTHER
Patients in Group A will perform pelvic floor contraction exercises as follows:
Starting position: Supine lying with knees bent and feet flat, or comfortable sitting on a firm chair. Technique: Patient is instructed to identify pelvic floor muscles by attempting to stop the flow of urine midstream (without performing this during actual urination). The contraction is described as a "squeeze and lift" of the pelvic floor. Protocol: Hold contraction for 5-10 seconds, then fully relax for equal duration. Perform 10 repetitions per set, 3 sets per session, with 60- second rest intervals between sets. Progression: Contraction hold time will be increased from 5 seconds (weeks 1-2) to 10 seconds (weeks 3-4) as muscle endurance improves. Total session duration: approximately 25-30 minutes.
REVERSE KEGEL EXERCISES (Pelvic Floor Relaxation) OTHER
Patients in Group B will perform pelvic floor eccentric relaxation exercises as follows:
Starting position: Supine lying, knees bent; or "happy baby" position (supine, knees drawn toward chest with feet facing ceiling) to facilitate pelvic floor lengthening.
Technique: Patient is guided to differentiate between pelvic floor contraction and relaxation. The Reverse Kegel involves a gentle, controlled "downward bearing out" or "expansion" of the pelvic floor, as though gently pushing the floor downward and outward on inhalation. This is the opposite of Kegel contraction. Protocol: Inhale slowly and allow pelvic floor to fully descend and elongate (2-3 seconds), hold the relaxed position for 5 seconds, then exhale and allow gentle passive recoil (no active contraction). Perform 10 repetitions per set, 3 sets per session, with 60- second rest intervals between sets. Biofeedback cueing will be used (verbal and palpatory) to confirm correct muscle release rather than inadvertent contraction
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
NPRS
Time frame: BASELINE AND AFTER 2 AND 4 WEEKS
NPRS 11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain (disabling, unable to perform
ODI (Oswestry Disability Index)
Time frame: BASELINE AND AFTER 2 AND 4 WEEKS
Assesses functional disability related to pain through a questionnaire covering daily activities.
TSTT (Timed Sitting Tolerance Test)
Time frame: BASELINE AND AFTER 2 AND 4 WEEKS
Measures the duration a patient can tolerate sitting before pain requires them to stop or change position.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (1)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
1 locations
UMTLahore, Punjab Province, PakistanStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- University of Management and Technology Lahore
- Study start
- Nov 5, 2026 Actual
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2026 Estimated
- Study completion
- Dec 31, 2026 Estimated
- First posted
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
Comparative Effect of Kegel and Reverse Kegel Exercises on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With Coccydynia
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
