Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07929129
CompletedNCT07929129ClinicalTrials.gov record

ESCAPE ROOM FOR PARAMEDIC STUDENTS

EMT-Paramedic · Paramedical Professionals · Education

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Age range
Not specified - Not specified
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Participants
69 Actual

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

Escape rooms are an entertainment activity that typically involves a team of two or more people. They utilise themes, narratives and various puzzles to challenge participants to find clues and solve problems within a set timeframe. This study was conducted to determine the impact of an escape room-based approach on paramedic students' knowledge and perceived professional competence in managing burn injuries during training. The study was designed as a randomised controlled trial. It was carried out during the 2024-25 academic year with second-year students enrolled on the "Emergency Response in Unusual Situations" course on the Paramedic (First and Emergency Aid) programme at a health services vocational school in Turkey. A total population sampling method was employed, meaning no specific sample selection process was used. Randomisation was stratified by the students' respective academic tracks: those in the evening programme formed the intervention group (n = 33), while those in the daytime programme formed the control group (n = 36). Data were collected after a theoretical lecture using a personal information form, a knowledge test and the "Emergency Medical Technician Professional Competence Perception Scale" (administered as a pre-test). Two weeks after the theoretical instruction, an "Emergency Intervention" escape room simulation focused on burn care and emergency response was conducted in a laboratory setting for the intervention group. Participants were organised into three-person teams and guided through specific scenarios. No such activity was implemented for the control group. Both groups then completed the knowledge test and the "Emergency Medical Technician Professional Competence Perception Scale" as a post-test. The analysis of the data used descriptive statistical methods, the independent samples t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, the paired samples t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Read the full description

Study procedure:

  • Data were collected from second-year students enrolled in the regular and evening programmes of the Paramedic (First and Emergency Aid) Programme at the Vocational School of Health Services during the spring semester of the 2024-25 academic year. These students were taking the "Emergency Response in Unusual Situations" course. Data collection took place in person at the department's skills laboratory, two weeks before the final examinations.
  • Students enrolled in the "Emergency Response in Unusual Situations" course, including those in the regular programme and the evening (second-shift) programme, attend classes in separate sections. For this reason, the randomisation process for the study was stratified by these sections using random.org: students in the evening programme were assigned to the intervention group and those in the regular programme to the control group.
  • Before the study began, the students were informed about the research and the "escape room" technique was introduced. Written informed consent was then obtained from them. The primary researcher then delivered a lecture on burns and emergency response to both the intervention and control groups. This four-hour session was conducted on the same day for both groups, albeit at different times (morning for the control group and afternoon for the intervention group), in a classroom setting. Subsequently, students in both groups were given a Personal Information Form, a Knowledge Test and the "Emergency Medical Technician Professional Competence Perception Scale" (EMT-PCPS) as a pre-test.
  • Two weeks after the lecture, the control group took a post-test comprising a knowledge test and the EMT-PCPS. The intervention group participated in an 'escape room' simulation activity centred on a burns and emergency response scenario in a laboratory setting.
  • Once all the necessary laboratory equipment and puzzles had been set up, the teams were admitted to the laboratory one by one. The laboratory door was locked once a team entered. Once they had completed the escape room activity, the team was given a key to unlock the door. A stopwatch was started when the 'Emergency Intervention' instruction was followed and stopped when the exit door was opened. The students were expected to follow the instructions provided to complete all the puzzles in the escape room, solve the questions to uncover codes and riddles, finish the scenario and prepare to intervene in a trauma situation using the acquired equipment. Finally, they had to exit the room.
  • Once all the students in the intervention group had completed the escape room activity, they took the Knowledge Test and the EMT-PCPS as post-tests.

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness to participate in the research
  • Being enrolled on the 'Emergency Response in Unusual Situations' course.
  • Participating in training on burns and emergency response.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to participate in training on burns and emergency response
  • Failing to complete the data collection instruments.
Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
Single masked
Escape Room

During the implementation phase of the study, knowledge tests and professional competence perception scales were administered as pre- and post-tests. Students in the intervention group were presented with scenarios and puzzles focusing on burns and emergency interventions in the form of an 'escape room' activity.

Behavioral: Escape room activity

Control

During the implementation phase of the study, knowledge tests and professional competence perception scales were administered as pre- and post-tests.

Escape room activity BEHAVIORAL

As part of an escape room activity, students in the intervention group were presented with scenarios and puzzles designed around burns and emergency response.

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

Differences of knowledge scores between groups

Time frame: To assess knowledge levels among paramedic students, a pre-test was administered in the first week, followed by a post-test two weeks later. Total duration: Three weeks.

The researchers developed a 'Knowledge Test' to assess knowledge levels, which was administered as both a pre-test and a post-test. The test consisted of ten questions and was scored out of 100. The scores obtained at the two time points were then compared. A higher post-test score compared to the pre-test score indicates an increase in knowledge.

Secondary measures

Differences in perceived professional competence scores among groups

Time frame: To assess the perception levels of professional competence among paramedic students, a pre-test was administered in the first week, followed by a post-test two weeks later. Total duration: Three weeks.

Pre- and post-tests were administered to measure the professional competence perception levels of paramedic students. The EMT-PCPS (Professional Competence Perception Scale for Paramedic Students) is an assessment tool that explores the professional competence perceptions of final-year students on the First Aid and Emergency Response Programme. It helps to identify educational needs and develop strategies to enhance student success and facilitate learning throughout the instructional process. The scale consists of four factors (subscales) and 65 items. Scores can be obtained for each individual in terms of both total and subscale scores; higher scores reflect a commendable level of professional competence perception.

Test scores obtained at two different time points were compared. The higher post-test scores indicate an increase in the students' perception of their professional competence.

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (1)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

1 locations

Çankırı Karatekin UniversityÇankırı, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
Çankırı Karatekin University
Study start
Apr 22, 2025 Actual
Primary completion
May 6, 2025 Actual
Study completion
May 27, 2025 Actual
First posted
Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.

Official study title

THE EFFECT OF THE ESCAPE ROOM TECHNIQUE ON KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEIVED PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN BURN CARE TRAINING FOR PARAMEDIC STUDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026