Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07927231
CompletedNCT07927231ClinicalTrials.gov record

Arduino-Based Real-Time Feedback for Manikin Endotracheal Intubation Training in Medical Students

Endotracheal Intubation · Medical Education · Simulation Training

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Age range
18 years - Not specified
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Participants
80 Actual

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

This study evaluated whether an Arduino-based device that provides real-time pressure and time feedback during manikin practice improves endotracheal intubation training for sixth-year medical students. Small teaching groups of three to four students were allocated by lot to practice either with a feedback-equipped manikin or with a standard manikin, within the same structured airway-management course. Upper-incisor loading during laryngoscopy, learner-reported autonomy, competence, intubation self-efficacy, and course satisfaction were measured before and after training, and intubation success was recorded during subsequent operating-room practice.

Read the full description

Single-center, two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled pretest-posttest study conducted during the 2022-2023 academic year at Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. The unit of allocation was the small teaching group (three to four students), assigned before each session by a physical chance-based procedure (lot drawing or coin toss).

Both arms received the same curriculum: a concept map of airway management, direct teaching and demonstration of airway adjuncts, bag-mask ventilation, and endotracheal intubation, followed by coached manikin practice with reflection and reattempts.

In the experimental arm, a pressure-sensing element at the tooth end of a standard laryngoscope blade transmitted signals to an Arduino-based display that showed a unitless upper-incisor pressure score and elapsed intubation time after each attempt, with an audible alarm above a preset pressure threshold. The control arm practiced on a standard manikin with usual instructor observation and verbal feedback.

The study was registered retrospectively after completion.

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sixth-year medical students undertaking clinical internship training at the study hospital during the 2022-2023 academic year
  • Enrolled in the structured airway-management course

Exclusion Criteria:

\* Students unwilling to participate

Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
No masking
Real-time feedback training

Structured airway-management course with coached manikin practice using the Arduino-based real-time pressure and time feedback laryngoscope (40 students).

Device: Arduino-based real-time feedback laryngoscope · Behavioral: Structured airway-management course

Standard manikin training

Same structured airway-management course with coached practice on a standard manikin and usual instructor observation and verbal feedback, without device-generated scores (40 students).

Behavioral: Structured airway-management course

Arduino-based real-time feedback laryngoscope DEVICE

Standard laryngoscope blade fitted with a pressure-sensing element at the tooth end, connected to an Arduino-based display that shows a unitless upper-incisor pressure score and elapsed intubation time after each manikin intubation attempt, with an audible alarm when sensed pressure exceeds a preset threshold. Used during coached manikin practice within the structured airway-management course.

Structured airway-management course BEHAVIORAL

Course-opening concept map of airway management, direct teaching and demonstration of oral and nasal airways, bag-mask ventilation, and endotracheal intubation, followed by coached practice on an airway manikin with instructor feedback, reflection, and reattempts. Delivered identically to both arms.

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

Upper-incisor pressure score

Time frame: Before training (pretest) and immediately after training (posttest), within the same teaching session

Unitless score generated by the pressure-sensing laryngoscope during a manikin intubation attempt; higher scores indicate less loading of the upper incisors. The posttest score is compared between arms with adjustment for the pretest score.

Secondary measures

Autonomy

Time frame: Before training (pretest) and immediately after training (posttest), within the same teaching session

Four-item learner-reported scale with 5-point responses (1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree); total score range 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived autonomy.

Competence

Time frame: Before training (pretest) and immediately after training (posttest), within the same teaching session

Four-item learner-reported scale with 5-point responses; total score range 4-20, higher scores indicate greater perceived competence.

Intubation self-efficacy

Time frame: Before training (pretest) and immediately after training (posttest), within the same teaching session

Seven-item learner-reported scale with 5-point responses; total score range 7-35, higher scores indicate greater intubation self-efficacy.

Course satisfaction

Time frame: Immediately after training

Mean score of three postcourse items with 5-point responses; range 1-5, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Operating-room intubation success

Time frame: During the clinical anesthesiology rotation following training

Proportion of successful endotracheal intubation attempts on patients in the operating room, with two to four scored attempts (success or failure) per student.

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (1)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

1 locations

Tri-Service General HospitalTaipei, TaiwanStatus unknown

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)
Study start
Aug 16, 2022 Actual
Primary completion
Aug 25, 2023 Actual
Study completion
Aug 26, 2023 Actual
First posted
Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.

Official study title

Effects of an Arduino-Based Real-Time Feedback Device on Manikin-Based Endotracheal Intubation Training in Medical Students: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Pretest-Posttest Study

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026