GPT-4-Based Virtual Patient Training for the PECARN Pediatric Head CT Rules
Medical Education · Head Injury, Minor
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Age range
- 18 years - Not specified
- Sex eligible
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Participants
- 20 Actual
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
This randomized pilot study evaluated whether training with a GPT-4-based virtual patient chat platform (Med2Lab) helps physicians learn the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) head CT rules, compared with conventional self-study. Physicians with less than 5 years of clinical experience received a short lecture on the PECARN rules and were randomly assigned to 1 hour of self-study with printed materials or 1 hour of history-taking practice with six GPT-4 virtual patients representing pediatric head trauma cases. Knowledge of the PECARN rules, clinical decision-making, history-taking and communication skills, satisfaction with the training, and usability of the platform were assessed.
Read the full description
Background: Generative AI chatbots such as GPT-4 can role-play patients from an educator-written prompt, allowing learners to practice history-taking as if with a real patient. The PECARN head CT rules guide CT decisions in children with minor head trauma and require structured history-taking.
Objective: To compare GPT-4-based virtual patient training with conventional self-study for learning the PECARN head CT rules, and to examine whether the platform improves history-taking and communication skills.
Methods: Prospective, randomized, parallel-group pilot trial at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Licensed physicians with no experience as an emergency department attending physician or with less than 5 years of clinical experience were recruited through the hospital intranet and online physician communities. After written informed consent, participants drew a slip from a box to be allocated 1:1 to the control or virtual patient group. All participants completed a baseline knowledge checklist (10 short-answer and 10 case-based items) and a mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) on pediatric head trauma cases, including a clinical decision assessment of PECARN risk category and need for head CT. All then received a 5-minute lecture on the PECARN rules. The control group studied for up to 1 hour with the printed PECARN publication, a summary, and six training cases in print. The virtual patient group practiced for up to 1 hour on the Med2Lab platform, interviewing six GPT-4 virtual patients built on PECARN scenarios, with case review by a virtual instructor after each case. The knowledge checklist and a mini-CEX on a new case were repeated after training, followed by questionnaires on confidence and satisfaction; the virtual patient group also completed the System Usability Scale. The planned sample was 40 participants (45 allowing for dropout).
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
\-
Inclusion Criteria:
- Licensed physician
- No experience as an emergency department attending physician, or less than 5 years of clinical experience
- Voluntary agreement to participate after reading the recruitment notice
Exclusion Criteria:
- Does not wish to participate
- Does not consent to the study
Exclusion Criteria:
\-
Understand screeningTreatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Random assignment
- Masking
- No masking
Virtual Patient Training
After a 5-minute lecture on the PECARN head CT rules, participants practiced history-taking for up to 1 hour on the Med2Lab platform with six GPT-4-based virtual patients representing pediatric head trauma cases, with case review by a virtual instructor after each case.
Behavioral: GPT-4-based virtual patient training
Self-Study With Printed Materials
After the same 5-minute lecture on the PECARN head CT rules, participants studied for up to 1 hour with printed materials: the original PECARN publication, a summary, and the same six training cases in printed form.
Behavioral: Self-study with printed materials
GPT-4-based virtual patient training BEHAVIORAL
Free-text history-taking practice with six GPT-4-based virtual patients on the Med2Lab platform (up to 1 hour). Each virtual patient is defined by an educator-written prompt describing a PECARN-based pediatric head trauma scenario and behavioral rules; after each case a virtual instructor reviews the case and the learner's clinical reasoning.
Self-study with printed materials BEHAVIORAL
Self-directed study for up to 1 hour with printed materials: the original PECARN head injury prediction rule publication, a summary of the rules, and the same six pediatric head trauma training cases in printed form.
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
Change in Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) Score
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the training session (same day)
History-taking and clinical performance on a standardized pediatric head trauma case, rated by two assessors with the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Emergency Department Mini-CEX form; the same assessors rate before and after training. Difference in change between groups.
Secondary measures
Change in Communication Skill Score
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the training session (same day)
Communication skills during the Mini-CEX case, rated with the communication skills assessment items (LCSAS) by the same assessors before and after training. Difference in change between groups.
Change in PECARN Knowledge Checklist Score
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the training session (same day)
Knowledge checklist on the PECARN head CT rules consisting of 10 short-answer items and 10 case-based decision items, administered before and after training. Difference in change between groups.
Change in Clinical Decision Accuracy
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the training session (same day)
Correct determination of the PECARN risk category and of the need for head CT on the standardized pediatric head trauma case (clinical decision assessment), before and after training. Difference in change between groups.
Other measures
Satisfaction With the Training
Time frame: Immediately after the training session (same day)
Post-training questionnaire on confidence and satisfaction with the education, completed by both groups.
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score
Time frame: Immediately after the training session (same day)
Usability of the Med2Lab virtual patient platform measured with the 10-item System Usability Scale (score 0-100; higher scores indicate better usability), virtual patient group only.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (1)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
1 locations
Samsung Medical CenterSeoul, South KoreaStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Study start
- Dec 13, 2023 Actual
- Primary completion
- Nov 20, 2025 Actual
- Study completion
- Nov 20, 2025 Actual
- First posted
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
Evaluating the Effectiveness and Usability of History Taking and Clinical Decision Training With a ChatGPT-Based Virtual Patient Platform: A Randomized Pilot Trial
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
