Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07829107
RecruitingNCT07829107ClinicalTrials.gov record

The PIONEER Comparative Effectiveness Study - Project 2

Head Injury Trauma · Traumatic Brain Injury, Mild

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry says this study is recruiting. Individual locations may have different availability.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Age range
18 years - Not specified
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Participants
3000 Estimated

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

This is a pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, stepped-wedge, Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. It is designed to evaluate both the comparative effectiveness and implementation feasibility of a biomarker-plus-clinical guidelines algorithm to reduce low-value brain computed tomography (CT) use in emergency department (ED) patients evaluated for suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI). The biomarkers are Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), two brain-injury proteins cleared by the FDA to support brain CT imaging decisions after trauma. All six participating EDs will contribute baseline data for the first 6 months under usual care (clinical guidelines only). Beginning in month 7, two sites will transition to implementing the biomarker-guided algorithm. At month 13, two additional sites will implement the biomarker-guided approach, and the final two sites will transition at month 19. By the end of the 24-month rollout period, all sites will have implemented the biomarker-guided pathway.

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion

  • Age ≥18 years at the time of the emergency department visit.
  • Presentation to a participating emergency department following a traumatic injury mechanism (motor vehicle collision, fall from height, assault, head injury/head trauma/head strike, struck by or against an object, facial injury or laceration, or other general trauma). Presentations may also include alcohol intoxication or syncope when associated with a suspected traumatic brain injury.
  • Evidence of potential head or brain injury, defined as (i) the head being struck by an object, (ii) the head striking a hard object or surface, (iii) exposure of the brain to significant acceleration/deceleration forces, or (iv) clinician documentation that the patient was evaluated for suspected traumatic brain injury.
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 at presentation.
  • Presentation to the emergency department within 24 hours of injury.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned computed tomography (CT) imaging of the maxillofacial bones, chest, abdomen, or pelvis during the ED encounter AND clinicians do not intend to avoid brain CT imaging even if the biomarker test is negative.
  • Current use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, including but not limited to: Warfarin, Factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., apixaban \[Eliquis\], rivaroxaban \[Xarelto\]), Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor.
  • Presentation \>24 hours after injury, due to the declining diagnostic sensitivity of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) beyond this time window.
Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
No masking
Clinical Pathway 2: Clinical Guidelines Only

Clinical Guidelines Only (Canadian CT Head Rule)

Diagnostic Test: Clinical guidelines only

Clinical Pathway 1: Guidelines + Biomarkers

Canadian CT Head Rule plus whole blood Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) measurement using the i-STAT.

Diagnostic Test: Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkers

Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkers DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients will be managed using an algorithm that integrates the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) with i-STAT whole-blood GFAP and UCH-L1 testing. Patients who meet CCHR criteria for CT imaging and those whose CT imaging decision-making is not covered by CCHR (e.g., no loss of consciousness or amnesia) will receive i-STAT testing. Sites will be assigned to one of three implementation waves, with two sites transitioning to the Guidelines + Biomarkers phase every six months. Prior to their assigned transition, sites will continue to use guidelines alone. Once a site transitions to the Guidelines + Biomarkers phase, the integrated biomarker-guided algorithm will become the standard-of-care protocol at that site for eligible patients and will remain the standard of care for the remainder of the study.

Clinical guidelines only DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

During the baseline phase, sites will rely solely on established clinical guidelines to guide brain CT utilization in patients with suspected TBI. Specifically, providers will apply the Canadian CT Head Rule, a validated decision instrument that identifies patients at high risk for clinically important brain injury who require CT imaging. All sites will begin in this Guidelines-Only baseline phase and will continue using this approach until their assigned transition to the Guidelines + Biomarkers phase. Sites will transition in three waves, with two sites transitioning every six months.

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

The proportion of eligible emergency department (ED) patients with suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) who receive brain CT imaging.

Time frame: Initial Emergency Department Visit (approximately 24 hours)

Not reported in this registry record.

Secondary measures

Proportion of eligible ED patients with suspected TBI who receive brain CT imaging and have a clinically significant traumatic lesion.

Time frame: Initial Emergency Department Visit (approximately 24 hours)

Not reported in this registry record.

Incidence of clinically significant missed traumatic intracranial injury diagnosed within 7 days of the index ED visit

Time frame: Within 7 days of the index/initial ED visit

Not reported in this registry record.

Incidence of neurosurgical interventions within 7 days of the index ED visit, without a new traumatic event.

Time frame: Within 7 days of the index/initial ED visit

Not reported in this registry record.

ED length of stay

Time frame: Initial Emergency Department Visit (approximately 24 hours)

This will be measured in minutes.

Initial and sustained provider adherence at 6 and 24 months post-implementation

Time frame: 6 and 24 months post-implementation

Not reported in this registry record.

Provider acceptability and feedback

Time frame: During implementation phase (months 9-32)

Providers will answer 17 questions regarding the implementation of the biomarker-guided algorithm and acceptability. Information from this will be summarized.

Provider trust in biomarker-guided CT decision making as measured by the proportion of biomarker-negative patients who don't get a CT

Time frame: During implementation phase (months 9-32)

Not reported in this registry record.

30-day ED revisits and hospitalizations

Time frame: 30 days following Initial Emergency Department Visit

Not reported in this registry record.

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (6)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

6 locations

UCLA-Olive View Medical CenterSylmar, California, United StatesRecruiting
Yesenia PerezCONTACTYPerez@dhs.lacounty.gov
Breena Taira, MD, MPHPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Harbor-UCLA Medical CenterTorrance, California, United StatesRecruiting
Kabir Yadav, MD, MS, MHSHPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Henry Ford Macomb (HFM)Clinton Township, Michigan, United StatesRecruiting
Jo-Ann RammalCONTACTJRammal1@hfhs.org313-404-9110
Joseph Miller, MD, MSPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Henry Ford Hospital (HFH)Detroit, Michigan, United StatesRecruiting
Jo-Ann RammalCONTACTJRammal1@hfhs.org313-404-9110
Joseph Miller, MD, MSPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Hillsboro Medical CenterPortland, Oregon, United StatesRecruiting
Maja Strusinska-ThayerCONTACTstrusins@ohsu.edu503-418-2713
Bory Kea, MD, MCRPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)Portland, Oregon, United StatesRecruiting
Maja Strusinska-ThayerCONTACTstrusins@ohsu.edu503-418-2713
Bory Kea, MD, MCRPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Study start
Oct 15, 2026 Actual
Primary completion
2029-01 Estimated
Study completion
2029-01 Estimated
First posted
Sep 18, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

Devon Newman, MSCONTACTdevonn@med.umich.edu734-652-9679
Official study title

Comparing the Effectiveness of a Biomarker-plus-clinical Guidelines Algorithm Versus Clinical Guidelines Only for Safely Decreasing Brain Computed Tomography Utilization During Brain Injury Evaluations: The PIONEER Comparative Effectiveness Study

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 11, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026