Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07718529
Not yet recruitingNCT07718529ClinicalTrials.gov record

Safety and Efficacy of a STOPping Strategy Versus Classical Maintenance Dose of JAK Inhibitors in Deep Remission Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative Colitis in Remission

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Age range
18 years - Not specified
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Participants
224 Estimated

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

This phase IV, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether a JAK inhibitor discontinuation strategy is superior to standard maintenance therapy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis who are in sustained deep remission. A total of 224 patients treated with tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib will be randomized to either treatment withdrawal or continuation of maintenance therapy and followed for 104 weeks. The primary objective is to compare safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction at Week 52, while secondary objectives include assessment of remission maintenance, quality of life, treatment exposure, endoscopic outcomes, and relapse rates

Read the full description

Background:

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are effective oral therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Their lack of immunogenicity provides a unique opportunity to evaluate treatment withdrawal and intermittent treatment strategies. However, safety concerns raised by regulatory agencies, including increased risks of infections, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignancies, support the investigation of strategies aiming to reduce long-term exposure to JAK inhibitors while maintaining disease control.

Objective:

To demonstrate the superiority of a JAK inhibitor stopping strategy compared with standard maintenance therapy in terms of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction in adults with ulcerative colitis in deep remission.

Study Design:

This is a phase IV, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with ulcerative colitis receiving a stable dose of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib for at least 12 months and achieving sustained steroid-free clinical, biological, and endoscopic remission for at least 6 months will be randomized to either treatment discontinuation or continuation of standard maintenance therapy. A total of 224 participants will be enrolled and followed for 104 weeks.

Primary Endpoint:

The primary endpoint is a composite outcome assessing treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks after randomization. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM 1.4).

Secondary Endpoints:

Secondary outcomes include adverse events and serious adverse events, maintenance of remission, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, JAK inhibitor exposure, endoscopic outcomes, relapse rates, treatment success at Weeks 52 and 104, and identification of predictors of successful treatment discontinuation.

Expected Benefits:

Reducing exposure to JAK inhibitors may improve the overall safety profile by decreasing treatment-related adverse events while reducing treatment burden for patients with ulcerative colitis. This strategy could support a more individualized and potentially safer long-term management approach for patients in sustained deep remission.

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosis of UC from at least 6 months according to clinical, endoscopic, histological and/or radiological criteria.
2. Male or female age ≥ 18 years
3. Currently treated by JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib, upadacitinib or filgotinib) for more than 12 months.
4. Currently at a stable dose of tofacitinib (5mg or 10mg twice a day), upadacitinib (15mg or 30mg per day) or filgotinib (200mg per day) for 6 months.
5. Clinical steroid free remission for at least 6 months, defined by a partial Mayo Score \< 2, with no subscore \> 1 and rectal bleeding (RB) subscore of 0 (annex 1).
6. Endoscopic steroid free remission for at inclusion, defined by a Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (annex 1).
7. Fecal calprotectin ≤ 150μg/g.
8. Without known risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE).
9. Without known risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
10. Without known risk factors for malignancy.
11. For women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP), and for men with partners who are WOCBP, willingness to use appropriate and efficient contraception, as recommended when using JAK inhibitor treatment (notably upadacitinib), during all the experimental treatment and until at least 4 weeks after the end of the experimental treatment, according to SmPC and CTFG (Clinical Trials Facilitation and Coordination Group) recommendations.
12. Patients able to understand information provide to them and to give written informed consent for study.
13. Affiliation to a social security scheme.
14. Good general health according to history and clinical examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Steroid use ≤ 6 months prior to enrolment.
2. Currently treated by steroid, immunosuppressive agents or biologics.
3. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study.
4. Breastfeeding.
5. Non-compliant subject or inability to follow study protocol.
6. Intolerance of JAK inhibitors (excipients included) or severe adverse event.
7. Contraindications to using a JAK inhibitor (excipients included).
8. Known risk factors for VTE.
9. Known risk factors for MACE.
10. Active neoplasia or history of malignant tumours less than 5 years old.
11. Participation to another interventional study protocol (except for RIPH3 studies)
12. Severe hepatic insufficiency.
13. Severe to end-stage renal insufficiency.
14. Active tuberculosis, serious infections such as septicemia or opportunistic infections.
15. Absence or refusal of informed consent.
16. People under guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protection;
17. People receiving psychiatric care;
18. People who have been deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative order
19. People with difficulty understanding and/or cognitive disorder

Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
No masking
standard of care

Not reported in this registry record.

STOP, treatment withdrawal

Not reported in this registry record.

Drug: treatment withdrawal

treatment withdrawal DRUG

the patients will stop their treatment, as long as possible until symptom reappearance, if any

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

Time frame: 1 year

treatment safety, during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

Time frame: 1 year

treatment efficacy, during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

Time frame: 1 year

patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

Secondary measures

Safety: occurrence of herpes zoster, infection, cardiovascular event, biochemical parameter, malignancies, adverse event leading to discontinuation, and all adverse events (serious or not) during the whole follow-up.

Time frame: 2 years

Not reported in this registry record.

Remission rate at the end the first 52 weeks of the follow-up

Time frame: 1 year

Not reported in this registry record.

Assess the treatment success of this innovative therapeutic strategy at the end of the first 52 weeks of the follow-up and after 104 weeks of follow-up.

Time frame: 2 years

Not reported in this registry record.

Partial Mayo score at each visit of the entire follow-up

Time frame: 2 years

Not reported in this registry record.

Number of days under treatment and cumulative dose of treatment per patient between randomization and primary endpoint

Time frame: 1 year

Not reported in this registry record.

Number of days under induction dose of JAK inhibitor at the end the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.

Time frame: 1 year

Not reported in this registry record.

Mayo endoscopic subscore at week 52 and week 104

Time frame: 2 years

Not reported in this registry record.

Proportion of patients relapsing for each arm

Time frame: 2 years

Not reported in this registry record.

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (22)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

22 locations

CHU Amiens-PicardieAmiens, FranceStatus unknown
Mathurin FUMERYPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Centre Hospitalier d'AvignonAvignon, FranceStatus unknown
Alban BENEZECHPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHRU BesançonBesançon, FranceStatus unknown
Lucine VUITTONPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU BordeauxBordeaux, FranceStatus unknown
Pauline RIVIEREPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU Clermont FerrandClermont-Ferrand, FranceStatus unknown
Anthony BUISSONPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Chu LilleLille, FranceStatus unknown
Maria NACHURYPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
HCLLyon, FranceStatus unknown
AP-HM hopital NordMarseille, FranceStatus unknown
Lucas GUILLOPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU MontpellierMontpellier, FranceStatus unknown
Romain ALTWEGGPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHRU NancyNancy, FranceStatus unknown
Bénédicte CaronCONTACTb.caron@chru-nancy.fr
Benedicte CARONPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU NantesNantes, FranceStatus unknown
Arnaud BOUREILLEPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU NiceNice, FranceStatus unknown
Adrien NICOLAUPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU NîmesNîmes, FranceStatus unknown
Ludovic CAILLOPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Hôpital BeaujonParis, FranceStatus unknown
Alexandre NUZZOPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Hôpital BicêtreParis, FranceStatus unknown
Aurélien AMIOTPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Hôpital Henri-MondorParis, FranceStatus unknown
Mathieu UZZANPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Institut des MICIParis, FranceStatus unknown
Carmen STEFANESCUPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Chu RennesRennes, FranceStatus unknown
Guillaume BOUGUENPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU RouenRouen, FranceStatus unknown
Nicolas RICHARDPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU St EtienneSaint-Etienne, FranceStatus unknown
Xavier ROBLINPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Chits ToulonToulon, FranceStatus unknown
Camille SIBERTIN BLANCPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
CHU ToulouseToulouse, FranceStatus unknown
Cyrielle GILETTAPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Study start
2027-01 Estimated
Primary completion
2030-01 Estimated
Study completion
2031-01 Estimated
First posted
Jul 22, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

Official study title

Safety and Efficacy of a STOPping Strategy Versus Classical Maintenance Dose of JAK Inhibitors in Deep Remission Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026