Safety and Efficacy of a STOPping Strategy Versus Classical Maintenance Dose of JAK Inhibitors in Deep Remission Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis in Remission
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Age range
- 18 years - Not specified
- Sex eligible
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Participants
- 224 Estimated
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
This phase IV, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether a JAK inhibitor discontinuation strategy is superior to standard maintenance therapy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis who are in sustained deep remission. A total of 224 patients treated with tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib will be randomized to either treatment withdrawal or continuation of maintenance therapy and followed for 104 weeks. The primary objective is to compare safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction at Week 52, while secondary objectives include assessment of remission maintenance, quality of life, treatment exposure, endoscopic outcomes, and relapse rates
Read the full description
Background:
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are effective oral therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Their lack of immunogenicity provides a unique opportunity to evaluate treatment withdrawal and intermittent treatment strategies. However, safety concerns raised by regulatory agencies, including increased risks of infections, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignancies, support the investigation of strategies aiming to reduce long-term exposure to JAK inhibitors while maintaining disease control.
Objective:
To demonstrate the superiority of a JAK inhibitor stopping strategy compared with standard maintenance therapy in terms of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction in adults with ulcerative colitis in deep remission.
Study Design:
This is a phase IV, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with ulcerative colitis receiving a stable dose of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib for at least 12 months and achieving sustained steroid-free clinical, biological, and endoscopic remission for at least 6 months will be randomized to either treatment discontinuation or continuation of standard maintenance therapy. A total of 224 participants will be enrolled and followed for 104 weeks.
Primary Endpoint:
The primary endpoint is a composite outcome assessing treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks after randomization. Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM 1.4).
Secondary Endpoints:
Secondary outcomes include adverse events and serious adverse events, maintenance of remission, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, JAK inhibitor exposure, endoscopic outcomes, relapse rates, treatment success at Weeks 52 and 104, and identification of predictors of successful treatment discontinuation.
Expected Benefits:
Reducing exposure to JAK inhibitors may improve the overall safety profile by decreasing treatment-related adverse events while reducing treatment burden for patients with ulcerative colitis. This strategy could support a more individualized and potentially safer long-term management approach for patients in sustained deep remission.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Diagnosis of UC from at least 6 months according to clinical, endoscopic, histological and/or radiological criteria.
2. Male or female age ≥ 18 years
3. Currently treated by JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib, upadacitinib or filgotinib) for more than 12 months.
4. Currently at a stable dose of tofacitinib (5mg or 10mg twice a day), upadacitinib (15mg or 30mg per day) or filgotinib (200mg per day) for 6 months.
5. Clinical steroid free remission for at least 6 months, defined by a partial Mayo Score \< 2, with no subscore \> 1 and rectal bleeding (RB) subscore of 0 (annex 1).
6. Endoscopic steroid free remission for at inclusion, defined by a Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (annex 1).
7. Fecal calprotectin ≤ 150μg/g.
8. Without known risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE).
9. Without known risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
10. Without known risk factors for malignancy.
11. For women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP), and for men with partners who are WOCBP, willingness to use appropriate and efficient contraception, as recommended when using JAK inhibitor treatment (notably upadacitinib), during all the experimental treatment and until at least 4 weeks after the end of the experimental treatment, according to SmPC and CTFG (Clinical Trials Facilitation and Coordination Group) recommendations.
12. Patients able to understand information provide to them and to give written informed consent for study.
13. Affiliation to a social security scheme.
14. Good general health according to history and clinical examination.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Steroid use ≤ 6 months prior to enrolment.
2. Currently treated by steroid, immunosuppressive agents or biologics.
3. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study.
4. Breastfeeding.
5. Non-compliant subject or inability to follow study protocol.
6. Intolerance of JAK inhibitors (excipients included) or severe adverse event.
7. Contraindications to using a JAK inhibitor (excipients included).
8. Known risk factors for VTE.
9. Known risk factors for MACE.
10. Active neoplasia or history of malignant tumours less than 5 years old.
11. Participation to another interventional study protocol (except for RIPH3 studies)
12. Severe hepatic insufficiency.
13. Severe to end-stage renal insufficiency.
14. Active tuberculosis, serious infections such as septicemia or opportunistic infections.
15. Absence or refusal of informed consent.
16. People under guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protection;
17. People receiving psychiatric care;
18. People who have been deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative order
19. People with difficulty understanding and/or cognitive disorder
Treatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Random assignment
- Masking
- No masking
standard of care
Not reported in this registry record.
STOP, treatment withdrawal
Not reported in this registry record.
Drug: treatment withdrawal
treatment withdrawal DRUG
the patients will stop their treatment, as long as possible until symptom reappearance, if any
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
treatment safety, during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
treatment efficacy, during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
The primary endpoint of this study will be a composite criterion of treatment safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
patient satisfaction during the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Secondary measures
Safety: occurrence of herpes zoster, infection, cardiovascular event, biochemical parameter, malignancies, adverse event leading to discontinuation, and all adverse events (serious or not) during the whole follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
Not reported in this registry record.
Remission rate at the end the first 52 weeks of the follow-up
Time frame: 1 year
Not reported in this registry record.
Assess the treatment success of this innovative therapeutic strategy at the end of the first 52 weeks of the follow-up and after 104 weeks of follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
Not reported in this registry record.
Partial Mayo score at each visit of the entire follow-up
Time frame: 2 years
Not reported in this registry record.
Number of days under treatment and cumulative dose of treatment per patient between randomization and primary endpoint
Time frame: 1 year
Not reported in this registry record.
Number of days under induction dose of JAK inhibitor at the end the first 52 weeks of the follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
Not reported in this registry record.
Mayo endoscopic subscore at week 52 and week 104
Time frame: 2 years
Not reported in this registry record.
Proportion of patients relapsing for each arm
Time frame: 2 years
Not reported in this registry record.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (22)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
22 locations
CHU Amiens-PicardieAmiens, FranceStatus unknown
Centre Hospitalier d'AvignonAvignon, FranceStatus unknown
CHRU BesançonBesançon, FranceStatus unknown
CHU BordeauxBordeaux, FranceStatus unknown
CHU Clermont FerrandClermont-Ferrand, FranceStatus unknown
Chu LilleLille, FranceStatus unknown
HCLLyon, FranceStatus unknown
AP-HM hopital NordMarseille, FranceStatus unknown
CHU MontpellierMontpellier, FranceStatus unknown
CHRU NancyNancy, FranceStatus unknown
CHU NantesNantes, FranceStatus unknown
CHU NiceNice, FranceStatus unknown
CHU NîmesNîmes, FranceStatus unknown
Hôpital BeaujonParis, FranceStatus unknown
Hôpital BicêtreParis, FranceStatus unknown
Hôpital Henri-MondorParis, FranceStatus unknown
Institut des MICIParis, FranceStatus unknown
Chu RennesRennes, FranceStatus unknown
CHU RouenRouen, FranceStatus unknown
CHU St EtienneSaint-Etienne, FranceStatus unknown
Chits ToulonToulon, FranceStatus unknown
CHU ToulouseToulouse, FranceStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
- Study start
- 2027-01 Estimated
- Primary completion
- 2030-01 Estimated
- Study completion
- 2031-01 Estimated
- First posted
- Jul 22, 2026 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
Official study title
Safety and Efficacy of a STOPping Strategy Versus Classical Maintenance Dose of JAK Inhibitors in Deep Remission Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
