Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07497399
RecruitingNCT07497399ClinicalTrials.gov record

Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry says this study is recruiting. Individual locations may have different availability.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Age range
18 years - 60 years
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Participants
120 Estimated

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if the study drug will reduce brain and retinal atrophy by reducing inflammation and subsequently slowing neurodegeneration in people with Multiple Sclerosis. The main outcome for the trial is change in normalized brain parenchymal volume (nBPV), measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Researchers will compare outcomes from participants randomized to the study drug, versus participants randomized to placebo, to see if there are signs of slowed neurodegeneration (i.e., reduction in brain and retinal atrophy).

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of MS (2024 criteria); clinically stable on MS therapy for ≥12 months without relapse or new lesions on brain MRI
  • Aged 18-60 years
  • Body mass index ≥27.0 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No GLP-1RA or GIP/GLP-1 RA in past year; no known hypersensitivity to medication class
  • No known Barrett's esophagus/gastroesophageal reflux disease, pancreatitis (including past), or gastroparesis
  • No personal/family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or history of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2
  • No chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤50 mL/min) in past year, type 1 diabetes, known diabetic retinopathy, use of insulin or insulin-inducing medications\*, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors\*\*, or warfarin; current/active alcohol or illicit substance abuse
  • No concerns about candidacy of individual on part of person's neurologist or study team clinicians
  • Current or planned (next 2 years) pregnancy/breastfeeding; if able to become pregnant, agree to reliable contraception (contraception requirements as discussed below)\*\*\*
  • currently-approved: Lispro, Aspart, Glulisine, Afrezza, Regular, Concentrated Regular, or Novolin, Velosulin, NPH, glargine, detemir, degludec, and premixed; approved secretagogues: sulphonylureas (e.g. glipizide (± metformin), glyburide (± metformin), glimepiride, pioglitazone/glimepiride) \& meglitinide analogues (nateglinide and repaglinide); \*\* currently-approved:sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin \*\*\*Contraception: Participants of childbearing potential (participant has a uterus and is pre-menopausal) must agree to use contraception, using either one method with a failure rate of \<1%/year, or two methods of lesser effectiveness:

Contraceptive methods with a failure rate of \< 1% per year includes the following:

  • Combined (estrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraception (vaginal ring, birth control patch) or progesterone-only hormonal contraception (birth control injections, intrauterine device (IUD), or hormone-releasing implant), or copper IUD
  • Complete abstinence from sexual encounters with a person who has testes

Those who do not wish to use one of the above methods of contraception must use two methods. Options include:

  • Oral hormonal contraception plus one barrier method during sexual encounter with a person who has testes (below). While typically oral hormonal contraception has a low failure rate, it is possible that the absorption of contraceptive pills taken by mouth will be impacted by the study drug and thus lower contraceptive effectiveness. Thus, people using pills as primary contraception must, during asexual encounter with a person who has testes, use a second form of barrier contraceptive (below) or must change to one of the other contraceptive methods listed above.
  • Two forms of barrier contraception during sexual encounter with a person who has testes. Examples of barrier contraceptive methods include the following:
  • A condom with or without spermicide
  • A cap, diaphragm, or sponge with or without spermicide
  • Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
Quadruple masked
NLY01 (Study Drug)

5 mg subcutaneous weekly for the first 4 weeks, then 10 mg subcutaneous weekly, with pre-planned dose adjustments if adverse events prevent full dosage.

Drug: NLY01

Placebo

Not reported in this registry record.

Drug: Placebo

NLY01 DRUG

NLY01 is a pegylated exenatide

Placebo DRUG

Placebo (saline solution)

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

Change in normalized (for head size) brain parenchymal volume (nBPV)

Time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Change in normalized (for head size) nBPV (mL). Measured from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks). Presented as mean and standard deviation

Secondary measures

Change in normalized gray matter volume (mL)

Time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Presented as mean and standard deviation Measured from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks).

Change in thalamic volume (mL)

Time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Measured from randomization to end of treatment (up to 96 weeks). Presented as mean and standard deviation.

Change in cortical thickness (mm)

Time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Measured from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks), Presented as mean and standard deviation.

Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

Time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Measured in μm, from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks),

Change in ganglion cell/inner plexiform thickness

Time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Measured in μm, from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks),

Disability progression as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Scale range 0-10; higher score is worse disability progression

Disability progression as assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC)

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) calculates a single Z-score from tests of ambulation, arm dexterity, and cognition. Scores are converted to a z score with a mean and standard deviation. A higher Z-score indicates better function.

Disability progression as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

The EDSS-plus allows for documentation of progression as a composite value, considering progression as having occurred if any one of the following occurs: 20% increase in timed 25-foot walk or 9-hole peg test, or a 1.0-point increase in EDSS (if baseline is 5.5 or less) or a 0.5-point increase (if baseline is \>5.5).

Patient-reported disability progression as assessed by the Patient-Determined Disease Steps

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Patient-Determined Disease Steps score range 0-8; higher is worse progression

Change in self-reported anxiety as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Anxiety Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Anxiety Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported depression as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported fatigue as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Fatigue Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Fatigue Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported upper extremity function as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Upper Extremity Function Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Upper Extremity Function Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported lower extremity function as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Lower Extremity Function Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Lower Extremity Function Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported cognitive function as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Cognitive Function Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Cognitive Function Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in positive affect/well-being as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Positive Affect/Well-being Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Positive Affect/Well-being Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported sleep disturbance as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Sleep Disturbance Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Sleep Disturbance Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported ability to participate in social roles Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Ability to Participate in Social Roles Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Ability to Participate in Social Roles Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Change in self-reported stigma as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Stigma Subscale

Time frame: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Stigma Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

Adverse events

Time frame: From randomization to week 96

Proportion of individuals in each arm experiencing adverse events

Serious adverse events

Time frame: From randomization to week 96

Proportion of individuals in each arm experiencing serious adverse events

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (3)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

3 locations

University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas City, Kansas, United StatesRecruiting
Sharon Lynch, MDPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, Maryland, United StatesRecruiting
Margaret VieiraCONTACTmvieira4@jh.edu667-306-8153
Ellen Mowry, MD, MCRPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Mount Sinai School of MedicineNew York, New York, United StatesRecruiting

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Study start
Apr 28, 2026 Actual
Primary completion
2030-01 Estimated
Study completion
2030-01 Estimated
First posted
Mar 27, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

Study ManagerCONTACTmvieira4@jh.edu667-306-8153
Official study title

Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis (TAG-MS): A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Arm Study

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026