Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07357727
RecruitingNCT07357727ClinicalTrials.gov record

A Phase 3 Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis (MF)

Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) · Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) · Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF)

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry says this study is recruiting. Individual locations may have different availability.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Age range
18 years - Not specified
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Participants
460 Estimated

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate whether treatment with pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib leads to improved clinical outcomes compared to ruxolitinib alone in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF) who have not previously received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.

Read the full description

The study for each participant is composed of several distinct periods: a screening period, a study treatment period, and a post-treatment follow-up phase.

1. Screening Period:

The screening period lasts for up to 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, which marks the beginning of treatment. During this time, the participant's eligibility for the study is confirmed, informed consent is obtained, and all required baseline assessments are completed.
2. Treatment Period:

The treatment period begins on Cycle 1 Day 1, which is the point of randomization and the start of study treatment. This period continues until the participant permanently discontinues study treatment, which may occur due to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, participant withdrawal, or other reasons specified in the protocol. Throughout this period, participants receive study drugs in 21-day cycles, with pelabresib or placebo administered for 14 days and ruxolitinib given continuously. Regular site visits and assessments are conducted according to the Schedule of Activities.
3. Safety Follow-up Period:

The safety follow-up period extends for 30 days (with a window of plus or minus 3 days) after the participant receives their last dose of pelabresib or placebo. During this period, participants are monitored for any late-onset adverse events or safety concerns that may arise after discontinuing the study treatment.
4. Efficacy Follow-up Period:

Following the safety follow-up, efficacy follow-up visits are scheduled every 12 weeks for participants who have not shown evidence of disease progression, meaning there is no documented progression of splenomegaly or leukemic transformation and no new therapy for myelofibrosis has been started. The purpose of this follow-up is to continue monitoring efficacy endpoints, such as spleen imaging, laboratory assessments, and bone marrow biopsies, until either disease progression occurs or a new therapy is initiated.
5. Survival Follow-up Period:

Once a participant enters the survival follow-up phase, follow-up visits are conducted every 12 weeks and may be performed remotely. This phase applies to participants who have experienced documented disease progression or have started a new therapy for myelofibrosis. The aim of survival follow-up is to monitor overall survival and to collect ongoing data regarding disease status and any subsequent therapies the participant may receive.

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants have diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF) according to the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias 2022
  • DIPSS risk category of intermediate-1, intermediate-2 or high-risk
  • Spleen volume ≥ 450 cm3 by CT or MRI scan (local read sufficient if no central read available)
  • Have an average TSS of ≥15 within 7 days prior to randomization, using MFSAF v. 4.0 (at least 4 out of 7 TSS assessments required for average calculation)
  • Participants with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, 1, or 2
  • Blasts \<5% in peripheral blood. Assessment of blasts in peripheral blood is mandatory at screening
  • Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L in the absence of growth factors or transfusions for the previous 4 weeks

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior splenectomy at any time or splenic irradiation in the previous 6 months
  • Prior hematopoietic cell transplant or participant anticipated to receive a hematopoietic cell transplant within 24 weeks from the date of randomization
  • Blasts ≥ 5% in bone marrow if results available at screening or history of accelerated phase (AP) or leukemic transformation
  • History of a malignancy (other than MF, PPV-MF or PET-MF) in the past 3 years in need of systemic treatment
  • Received any approved or investigational agent other than hydroxyurea or anagrelide for the treatment of MF within 14 days of first dose of study treatment or within 5 half-lives of the approved or investigational agent, whichever is longer
  • Prior treatment with any JAK inhibitor or Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
Quadruple masked
Arm 1: Pelabresib + Ruxolitinib

Participants in this arm receive pelabresib (DAK539) orally once daily for 14 days of each 21-day cycle, in combination with ruxolitinib, which is taken orally twice daily throughout each cycle. Participants may continue receiving study treatment until they experience unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or until either the investigator or the participant decides to discontinue treatment.

Drug: Pelabresib · Drug: Ruxolitinib

Arm 2: Placebo + Ruxolitinib

Participants in this arm receive a matching placebo orally once daily for 14 days of each 21-day cycle, together with ruxolitinib, which is also taken orally twice daily throughout each cycle.

Participants may continue receiving study treatment until they experience unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or until either the investigator or the participant decides to discontinue treatment.

Drug: Ruxolitinib · Drug: Placebo

Pelabresib DRUG

Pelabresib monohydrate tablets

Ruxolitinib DRUG

Ruxolitinib phosphate tablets

Placebo DRUG

Matches pelabresib

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

Number of Participants with Splenic Response (SVR35) by Central Radiology Reads at Week 24 in participants with baseline total symptom score (TSS) ≥ 25

Time frame: Week 24

Spleen Response (SVR35) is defined as achieving a reduction of at least 35 percent in spleen volume from baseline to Week 24, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan, and assessed by a centralized radiology review in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 25.

Absolute change from baseline in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 25

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Symptom improvement at Week 24 is defined as the absolute change from baseline in the total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24, as measured by the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form version 4.0 (MFSAF v4.0) in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 25.

Number of Participants with Splenic Response (SVR35) by Central Radiology Reads at Week 24 in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 15

Time frame: Week 24

Spleen Response (SVR35) is defined as achieving a reduction of at least 35 percent in spleen volume from baseline to Week 24, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan, and assessed by a centralized radiology review in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 15.

Absolute change from baseline in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 15

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Symptom improvement at Week 24 is defined as the absolute change from baseline in the total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24, as measured by the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form version 4.0 (MFSAF v4.0) in participants with baseline TSS ≥ 15.

Secondary measures

Number of Participants with Splenic Response (SVR35) by Central Radiology Reads over time

Time frame: Week 12, Week 36, Week 48 and every 12 weeks thereafter till End of Study (an average of 3 years)

Spleen Response (SVR35) over time is defined as achieving a reduction of at least 35 percent in spleen volume from baseline to Week 12, Week 36, Week 48 and thereafter, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan, and assessed by a centralized radiology review.

Absolute change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in spleen volume over time

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and every 12 weeks thereafter till End of Study (an average of 3 years)

Absolute and percentage change from baseline in spleen volume over time will be summarized using descriptive summary statistics

Time to first SVR35 response

Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of first SVR35 response, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Time to first SVR35 response defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first SVR35 response as measured by MRI (or CT scan) will be summarized by treatment arm.

Duration of first SVR35 response

Time frame: From first SVR35 response to loss of response, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Duration of first SVR35 response defined as the time from first SVR35 response to loss of response for any participant who reaches SVR35 at any time.

Number of Participants with TSS50 response at Week 24

Time frame: Week 24

Symptom response defined as achieving ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) from baseline to Week 24 as measured by the MFSAF v4.0

Number of Participants with TSS50 response over time

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and every 12 weeks thereafter till End of Study (an average of 3 years)

Symptom response defined as achieving ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) from baseline to Week 12, Week 36, Week 48 and thereafter as measured by the MFSAF v4.0

Absolute and percentage change from baseline in TSS over time

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and every 12 weeks thereafter till End of Study (an average of 3 years)

Absolute change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in TSS over time

Time to first TSS50 response

Time frame: From date of randomization till date of first TSS50 response, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Time to first TSS50 response defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first TSS50 response as measured by the MFSAF v4.0.

Duration of TSS50 response

Time frame: From first TSS50 response to loss of response, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Duration of TSS50 response defined as the time from first TSS50 response to loss of response for any participant who reaches TSS50 at any time.

Dual Response (SVR35 + TSS50)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and every 12 weeks thereafter till End of Study (an average of 3 years)

Dual response is defined as achieving both ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) and ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) from baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48 and every 12 weeks thereafter, with SVR measured by MRI (or CT scan) and assessed by central radiology read and TSS measured by MFSAF v4.0.

Hemoglobin response

Time frame: 12 consecutive weeks (rolling window) up to 7 days following last dose of pelabresib/placebo

Hemoglobin response defined as a ≥1.5 g/dL average increase in hemoglobin from baseline in any 12-week mean hemoglobin concentration.

Change from baseline in hemoglobin over time

Time frame: Up to 7 days following last dose of pelabresib/placebo

Change from baseline in hemoglobin over time will be summarized using descriptive summary statistics.

Anemia response over time

Time frame: Up to 7 days following last dose of pelabresib/placebo

Anemia response (major response, minor response, stable anemia, progressive anemia) as per proposed 2024 IWG-ELN criteria in participants with transfusion dependent and non-transfusion dependent anemia (Tefferi et al 2024).

Overall survival (OS)

Time frame: From date of randomization till date of death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Progression-free survival (PFS)

Time frame: From date of randomization till date of documented disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time from date of randomization to date of documented disease progression, or death due to any cause whichever comes first.

Leukemia-free survival (LFS)

Time frame: From date of randomization till date of leukemic transformation, or death due to any cause whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 3 years

Leukemia-free survival (LFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of leukemic transformation, or death due to any cause whichever comes first.

Exposure-Adjusted Incidence Rate (EAIR) of Participants with Leukemic Transformation

Time frame: Throughout study completion (an average of 3 years)

The EAIR of participants with leukemic transformation is the rate at which this event occurs, adjusted for the actual time participants were exposed to the study drug(s).

Number of participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Time frame: Up to 30 days following last dose of pelabresib/placebo

Incidence of adverse events by type, frequency, and severity, as graded by the NCI CTCAE version 5.0.

Pelabresib plasma concentrations

Time frame: Cycle 1: Day 1 (0/Pre-dose and 0.5 post dose), Day 7 (0/Pre-dose), Day 14 (0/Pre-dose, 2, and 5 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 21 days.

Blood samples for pelabresib pharmacokinetics (PK) will be obtained and evaluated in all participants at all dose levels and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Maximum observed plasma Concentration (Cmax) of pelabresib in participants enrolled in China and Japan

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day Day 14 (0/Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 21 days.

Venous whole blood samples will be collected for pharmacokinetic characterization in a subset of participants enrolled in China and Japan. Cmax will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Time to Maximum observed plasma Concentration (Tmax) of pelabresib in participants enrolled in China and Japan

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day Day 14 (0/Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 21 days.

Venous whole blood samples will be collected for pharmacokinetic characterization in a subset of participants enrolled in China and Japan. Tmax will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve over a dosing interval (AUCtau) of pelabresib in participants enrolled in China and Japan

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day Day 14 (0/Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 21 days.

Venous whole blood samples will be collected for pharmacokinetic characterization in a subset of participants enrolled in China and Japan. AUCtau will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Change from baseline over time in fatigue as measured by PROMIS SF v1.0 Fatigue 7a

Time frame: Baseline, once per week from Cycles 1 to 9 (each cycle is 21 days), day 1 of every odd cycle thereafter, within 7 days of last dose of pelabresib/placebo and at 12 weeks following last dose of pelabresib/placebo

The PROMIS Short Form version 1.0 Fatigue 7a is a seven-question survey that measures how much fatigue has affected a person over the past week. Each question is rated from "Never" to "Always" on a five-point scale. The total score is converted to a standardized score, where the average is 50 and the standard deviation is 10.

A lower score means less fatigue and minimal impact on daily life, while a higher score indicates more severe fatigue and greater disruption of daily activities.

Change from baseline over time in overall QOL and functional scales as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30

Time frame: Baseline, day 1 of every cycle from Cycle 1 to 9 (each cycle is 21 days), day 1 of every odd cycle thereafter, within 7 days of last dose of pelabresib/placebo and at 12 weeks following last dose of pelabresib/placebo

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) measures overall quality of life and key functional areas in people with cancer, including physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning.

Items are rated from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except for the global quality of life scale, which uses a 1 to 7 scale.

Scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale.

Higher scores indicate better functioning and quality of life, while lower scores reflect poorer functioning and well-being.

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (165)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

165 locations

Rocky Mountain Cancer CentersDenver, Colorado, United StatesRecruiting
Christopher BentonPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Yale University School Of MedicineNew Haven, Connecticut, United StatesRecruiting
Farah FasihuddinCONTACTfarah.fasihuddin@yale.edu
Nikolai PodoltsevPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Florida Cancer Specialist South RegFort Myers, Florida, United StatesRecruiting
Christina CarusoCONTACTCcaruso@flcancer.com
Fadi KayaliPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
The Anderson Family Cancer InstituteJupiter, Florida, United StatesRecruiting
Christine LeonardCONTACTchristine.leonard@jupitermed.com
Ryan DevinePRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Miami NS Ins Baptist Health S FLMiami, Florida, United StatesRecruiting
Firas El ChaerPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Florida Cancer Specialists-NorthSt. Petersburg, Florida, United StatesRecruiting
Kelly WhiteheadCONTACTkelly.whitehead@flcancer.com
Viralkumar BhanderiPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Florida Cancer Specialists EastStuart, Florida, United StatesRecruiting
Mary Jo LuserCONTACTMaryJo.Luser@flcancer.com
Judah FriedmanPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory UniversityAtlanta, Georgia, United StatesRecruiting
Danielle AlexanderCONTACTdanielle.oliver@emory.edu
Anthony Michael HunterPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
University of Chicago HospitalChicago, Illinois, United StatesRecruiting
Anand PatelPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Franciscan Health IndianapolisIndianapolis, Indiana, United StatesRecruiting
Waled BahajPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
American Oncology Partners PA Center for Cancer and Blood DisordersBethesda, Maryland, United StatesRecruiting
Raissa ToureCONTACTraissa.toure@aoncology.com
Ralph BocciaPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Summit Medical Group OncologyBerkeley Heights, New Jersey, United StatesRecruiting
Dipen PatelPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
New York Oncology Hematology P CAlbany, New York, United StatesRecruiting
Yolenny VargasCONTACTyolenny.vargas@nyoh.com
Lawrence GarboPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Columbia University Medical Center New York PresbyterianNew York, New York, United StatesRecruiting
Monica KasbekarPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Sanford Research USD FargoFargo, North Dakota, United StatesRecruiting
Richard SheppardPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbus, Ohio, United StatesRecruiting
Hannah DavisCONTACTHannah.Davis@osumc.edu
Andrew SrisuwananukornPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Texas Oncology - Central SouthAustin, Texas, United StatesRecruiting
Marian HeavenCONTACTmarian.heaven@usoncology.com
Jason M MelearPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Texas Oncology PA Dallas Presbyterian HospitalDallas, Texas, United StatesRecruiting
Khoan VuPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, Texas, United StatesRecruiting
Maria PinsoyCONTACTmbpinsoy@mdanderson.org
Prithviraj BosePRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
SCRI Texas Oncology Northeast TexasTyler, Texas, United StatesRecruiting
Shelly MaxfieldCONTACTshelly.maxfield@usoncology.com
Shail DalalPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Virginia Cancer SpecialistsFairfax, Virginia, United StatesRecruiting
Syed HasanCONTACTsyed.hasan@usoncology.com
Mitul GandhiPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Fred Hutch Cancer ResearchSeattle, Washington, United StatesRecruiting
Lisa GrimmCONTACTlgrimm@fredhutch.org
Bart ScottPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Novartis Investigative SiteCABA, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaRecruiting
Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San MartinBuenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., ArgentinaRecruiting
Francisca RojasPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Hospital Italiano de Buenos AiresCABA, ArgentinaRecruiting
Georgina BendekPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
FUNDALEUCapital Federal, ArgentinaRecruiting
Federico Sackmann, DrPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Hospital Privado de CordobaCórdoba, ArgentinaRecruiting
Ana Lisa BasquieraPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Novartis Investigative SiteAdelaide, South Australia, AustraliaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteClayton, Victoria, AustraliaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGraz, AustriaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSalzburg, AustriaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSankt Pölten, AustriaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteVienna, AustriaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteWoluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels Capital, BelgiumRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteRoeselare, BelgiumRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGoiânia, Goiás, BrazilRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteCuritiba, Paraná, BrazilRecruiting
Grupo ELORAFlorianópolis, Santa Catarina, BrazilRecruiting
Jaisson BortoliniPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Novartis Investigative SiteBarretos, São Paulo, BrazilRecruiting
Jewish General HospitalMontreal, Quebec, CanadaRecruiting
Shireen SirhanPRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
View location on map ↗
Novartis Investigative SiteHefei, Anhui, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGuangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGuangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteWuhan, Hubei, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteWuhan, Hubei, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteNanjing, Jiangsu, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteNantong, Jiangsu, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteNanchang, Jiangxi, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteChangchun, Jilin, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteJinan, Shandong, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteYantai, Shandong, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKunming, Yunnan, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteHangzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteWenzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBeijing, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteChongqing, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteDalian, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteFuzhou, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteShanghai, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteShenyang, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteTianjin, ChinaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteOstrava, Poruba, CzechiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBrno, CzechiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteHradec Králové, CzechiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteOlomouc, CzechiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePrague, CzechiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBrest, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteLe Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteLens, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMarseille, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteNîmes, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteParis, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePessac, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePoitiers, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteRennes, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteStrasbourg, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteToulouse, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteVandœuvre-lès-Nancy, FranceRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteJena, Thuringia, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteAachen, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteCottbus, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteErlangen, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteHamburg, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteHanover, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMinden, GermanyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteChhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, IndiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePune, Maharashtra, IndiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteRishikesh, Uttarakhand, IndiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKolkata, West Bengal, IndiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteDelhi, IndiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMeldola, FC, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteFlorence, FI, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMonza, MB, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePalermo, PA, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePadova, PD, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteRoma, RM, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteVerona, VR, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteNaples, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteNovara, ItalyRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteToyoake, Aichi-ken, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKamogawa, Chiba, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSapporo, Hokkaido, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKobe, Hyōgo, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteShiwa-Gun, Iwate, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteTsu, Mie-ken, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKurashiki, Okayama-ken, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBunkyo Ku, Tokyo, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteChūō, Yamanashi, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteFukuoka, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKumamoto, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMiyazaki, JapanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGeorge Town, Pulau Pinang, MalaysiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKota Kinabalu, Sabah, MalaysiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKuching, Sarawak, MalaysiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteJohor Bahru, MalaysiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKuala Selangor, MalaysiaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePuebla City, MexicoRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteAmsterdam, North Holland, NetherlandsRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteUtrecht, NetherlandsRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGdansk, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKatowice, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteLublin, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSkorzewo, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteTorun, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteWarsaw, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteWałbrzych, PolandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSuwon, Gyeonggi-do, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteJeonju, Jeollabuk-do, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSeoul, Yangcheon Gu, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBusan, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSeoul, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSeoul, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSeoul, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSeoul, South KoreaRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteDonostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteEl Palmar, Murcia, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SitePamplona, Navarre, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteAlicante, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBarcelona, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteLas Palmas GC, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteLeón, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMadrid, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteMálaga, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSalamanca, SpainRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBasel, SwitzerlandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBern, SwitzerlandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGeneva, SwitzerlandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteGenolier, SwitzerlandRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteChanghua, TaiwanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKaohsiung City, TaiwanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteTainan, TaiwanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteTaipei, TaiwanRecruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSakarya, Adapazari, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteIstanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteAnkara, Kecioren, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteBursa, Nilufer, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteIstanbul, Pendik, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteAnkara, Sihhiye Altindag, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteAnkara, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteIzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteKocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting
Novartis Investigative SiteSamsun, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study start
May 27, 2026 Actual
Primary completion
May 17, 2028 Estimated
Study completion
Dec 27, 2030 Estimated
First posted
Jan 22, 2026 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

Novartis PharmaceuticalsCONTACTnovartis.email@novartis.com1-888-669-6682
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCONTACTnovartis.email@novartis.com+41613241111
Official study title

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-control Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib vs. Placebo and Ruxolitinib in Adult Patients With Myelofibrosis Who Are JAK Inhibitor Naive

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 11, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026