Local research. Human connections. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Back to study searchNCT07045740
CompletedNCT07045740ClinicalTrials.gov record

Physiotherapist Navigator Pilot Trial

Cancer

THE QUICK READ

What this study involves

The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Age range
18 years - Not specified
Sex eligible
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Participants
26 Actual

These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.

About the research

Background: More Canadians are living with and beyond cancer in Canada. However, most survivors live with harsh side effects due to cancer and its treatments. While international guidelines recommend involving physiotherapists (PTs) in cancer care, many countries do not provide access to these services as a standard part of treatment. Healthcare navigators help patients overcome barriers and streamline care which has shown to improve clinical processes while reducing clinical and patient costs. Through ongoing and routine assessment, a PT Navigator could specifically address issues like fatigue and strength loss, refer patients to other needed services, and help set goals to improve quality of life. Currently, there are no PT Navigator roles in acute cancer care settings in Canada. The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a PT Navigator role for individuals living with cancer receiving cancer treatment.

Methods:

Participants will include adults recently diagnosed with cancer who are/will be receiving cancer treatment (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy), are English-speaking and community dwelling. Participants in the intervention group will be followed by the PT Navigator for 12-18 weeks who will screen for early side effects of cancer and its treatment and respond or refer accordingly. Participants in the control group will continue with usual care.

Outcomes: Participants will be assessed at 3 time points. The primary outcome is adherence. Secondary outcomes include other feasibility measures such as retention, recruitment, satisfaction, and preliminary effectiveness will be assessed using overall impairment score, self-reported exercise volume, quality of life, health care utilization, exercise capacity and physical function.

Impact:

If feasible, this will be the first study to facilitate routine PT assessment and early intervention as a component of cancer care in Canada. Findings will inform future methods examining the novel role and can improve the way rehabilitation services are provided to individuals living with or beyond cancer in Canada and internationally.

Read the full description

Rationale: Cancer affects nearly half of Canadians in their lifetime, and while survival rates are improving, many individuals live with long-term side effects that impact their quality of life. Physical activity and rehabilitation have been shown to improve physical function, reduce mental health symptoms, and enhance overall well-being for those living with and beyond cancer. Despite recommendations from international guidelines for physiotherapists (PTs) to be involved in cancer care, only 30% of Canadian cancer survivors have access to rehabilitation services. Incorporating PT Navigators into care teams early into cancer treatment could work to identify and address barriers, provide individualized symptom management, and connect patients with relevant services. However, no research to date has evaluated the role of PTs as navigators in acute cancer care settings in Canada.

Objective and Research Questions:

The objective of this study is to examine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a PT Navigator role for individuals living with cancer receiving cancer treatment (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy) in an acute cancer care setting.

Research Question 1 (Primary): Is a PT-Navigator role feasible to implement at a cancer institution in Ontario, Canada? Research Question 2 (Secondary): Do individuals with cancer who are monitored by a PT-Navigator demonstrate trends for improved outcomes in overall impairment score, QOL, physical activity levels, exercise capacity, functional strength, activity limitations, and a reduction in health care utilization costs compared to individuals with cancer who are not monitored by a PT Navigator during treatment?

Study Design: Pilot randomized control trial Participants: Adults aged ≥18 years old, recently diagnosed with any type/stage of cancer who are/will be receiving cancer treatment (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy), English-speaking, and are community-dwelling Procedure: Participants will be randomized to two groups. Intervention Group (PT Navigator): An assessment and 6 follow up sessions approximately every 2-3 weeks with the PT Navigator.

Control Group (Usual Care): No intervention.

Significance:

Results of this study will aim to maximize the success and feasibility of the role when trialed in a future larger scaled randomized controlled trial. The overall goal of the project is to facilitate routine assessment and early intervention as a standard component of cancer care in Canada.

Who may be able to participate?

The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults aged ≥18 years old; recently diagnosed with any type/stage of cancer who are/will be receiving cancer treatment (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy); English-speaking; are community-dwelling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a self-reported physical or cognitive impairment that would prevent them from carrying out a physical assessment
Understand screening

Treatment, groups and participation

The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.

Assignment
Random assignment
Masking
No masking
PT Navigator

Not reported in this registry record.

Other: PT Navigator

Usual Care

Not reported in this registry record.

PT Navigator OTHER

Participants assigned to the intervention group will meet with the PT Navigator withing the first month of starting cancer treatment. Following a one-hour initial assessment, the PT Navigator will follow up every two-three weeks for a total of six sessions. The PT Navigator will administer outcome measures to screen for complications or side effects of treatment. If any complications or side-effects are identified, the PT Navigator will facilitate referrals to other health care practitioners, provide exercise and/or rehabilitation treatment, or provide education and continue monitoring.

Prepare your questions

What researchers are measuring

Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.

Primary measures

Adherence Rate

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

Adherence will be measured dichotomously through attendance (i.e., yes/no) at each session by the PT Navigator

Secondary measures

Retention Rate

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

Retention will be measured by the number of individuals who complete both a baseline and follow up assessment

Recruitment Rate

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

To assess recruitment rate, electronic records will be kept detailing the source and date of recruitment offer and how many eligible referrals are enrolling into the study

Participant Satisfaction

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

7-point Likert scale; 1-7 - higher scores indicate greater satisfaction

Participant Satisfaction

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

7-point Likert scale; 1-7 - higher scores indicate greater satisfaction

Overall Impairment Score

Time frame: 12-18 weeks weeks

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS); higher scores represent higher perceived symptom burden; scores ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent and 10 indicates the worst possible severity

Overall Impairment Score

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS); higher scores represent higher perceived symptom burden; scores ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent and 10 indicates the worst possible severity

Self-Reported Exercise Volume

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (higher scores represent higher volume of exercise)

Self-Reported Exercise Volume

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (higher scores represent higher volume of exercise)

Health-Related Quality of Life

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

EORTC QLQ-C30; a high score for a functional scale represents a high level of functioning, a high score for the QoL represents a high QoL, a high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology; a scale of 0 to 100

Health-Related Quality of Life

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

EORTC QLQ-C30; a high score for a functional scale represents a high level of functioning, a high score for the QoL represents a high QoL, a high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology; a scale of 0 to 100

Health-Related Quality of Life

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G); higher scores represent better QoL; Total scores range from 0-108

Health-Related Quality of Life

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G); higher scores represent better QoL; Total scores range from 0-108

Health Care Utilization

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

This questionnaire assesses loss of work, procedures received, and all health-related visits (i.e., family doctor, support services). All costs will be calculated according to current (2025) Ontario healthcare standards and presented in CAD.

Health Care Utilization

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

This questionnaire assesses loss of work, procedures received, and all health-related visits (i.e., family doctor, support services). All costs will be calculated according to current (2025) Ontario healthcare standards and presented in CAD.

Physical Functioning

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

30 second Sit to Stand

Physical Functioning

Time frame: 20-26 weeks weeks

30 second Sit to Stand

Exercise Capacity

Time frame: 12-18 weeks

6 minute Walk Test

Exercise Capacity

Time frame: 20-26 weeks

6 minute Walk Test

No results are flagged as posted.

Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.

Open official results ↗

Research locations (1)

The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.

1 locations

McMaster UniversityHamilton, Ontario, CanadaStatus unknown

Study team and timeline

Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Study start
Nov 21, 2025 Actual
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2026 Actual
Study completion
Nov 1, 2026 Actual
First posted
Jul 1, 2025 Actual
Last updated
Nov 10, 2026 Actual

Official study contacts

No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.

Official study title

Evaluation of a Novel Role Proposal for the Use of a Physiotherapist Navigator in an Acute Cancer Care Setting in Ontario: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

A HUMAN NEXT STEP

Ask Wellness Clinical Research

Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.

Please do not include medical records, diagnoses, medications, insurance numbers or other sensitive details. This form is for general questions, not urgent care.

Sending a question does not enroll you in a trial.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.

Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026