A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of a Higher Dose of Ocrelizumab in Adults With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS)
Multiple Sclerosis
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Age range
- 18 years - 55 years
- Sex eligible
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Participants
- 864 Actual
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
This is a randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel group, multicenter study to evaluate efficacy, safety and PK of a higher dose of ocrelizumab per intravenous (IV) infusion every 24 weeks (Q24W) in participants with RMS, in comparison to the approved 600 milligrams (mg) dose of ocrelizumab.
Read the full description
Participants will be treated for a minimum of 120 weeks in the double-blind treatment (DBT) phase. Upon positive primary results after the DBT phase, an optional higher dose extension treatment, open-label extension (OLE) phase is planned for eligible participants. The OLE will be carried out for approximately 96 weeks. Participants will be followed for safety for 48 weeks thereafter. Participants whose B-cell levels still did not replete to their baseline level or the low level of normal (LLN), whichever is lower, will move into the B-cell monitoring (BCM) phase following the safety follow-up phase. The study will end when all participants who were not treated with an alternative B-cell depleting therapy have repleted their B-cells to the baseline value or the LLN.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of RMS
- At least two documented clinical relapses within the last 2 years prior to screening, or one clinical relapse in the year prior to screening. No relapse 30 days prior to screening and at baseline
- Participants must be neurologically stable for at least 30 days prior to randomization and baseline
- EDSS score, at screening and baseline, from 0 to 5.5 inclusive
- Average T25FWT score over two trials at screening and over two trials at baseline respectively, up to 150 (inclusive) seconds
- Average 9HPT score over four trials at screening and over four trials at baseline respectively, up to 250 (inclusive) seconds
- Documented magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain with abnormalities consistent with MS at screening
- Participants requiring symptomatic treatment for MS and/or physiotherapy must be treated at a stable dose. No initiation of symptomatic treatment for MS or physiotherapy within 4 weeks of randomization
- Females of childbearing potential, agreement to remain abstinent or use adequate contraceptive methods
- Female participants without reproductive potential may be enrolled e.g. if post-menopausal or if surgically sterile
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of primary progressive MS at screening
- Any known or suspected active infection at screening or baseline (except nailbed infections), or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antimicrobials within 8 weeks or treatment with oral antimicrobials within 2 weeks, prior to and during screening
- History of confirmed or suspected progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
- History of cancer, including hematologic malignancy and solid tumors, within 10 years of screening
- Immunocompromised state
- Receipt of a live or live-attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to randomization
- Inability to complete an MRI or contraindication to gadolinium administration
- Contraindications to mandatory pre-medications for infusion-related reaction (IRRs)
- Known presence of other neurologic disorders that could interfere with the diagnosis of MS or assessments of efficacy and/or safety during the study
- Any concomitant disease that may require chronic treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants during the course of the study
- Significant, uncontrolled disease that may preclude participant from participating in the study
- History of or currently active primary or secondary, non-drug-related, immunodeficiency
- Pregnant or breastfeeding or intending to become pregnant
- Lack of peripheral venous access
- History of alcohol or other drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening
- Treatment with any investigational agent within 24 weeks prior to screening or treatment with any experimental procedure for MS
- Previous use of anti- cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20s) (including ocrelizumab), unless the last infusion was more than 2 years before screening, B-cell count is normal, and the stop of the treatment was not motivated by safety reasons or lack of efficacy
- Previous treatment with fingolimod, siponimod, or ozanimod within 6 weeks of baseline
- Previous treatment with natalizumab within 4.5 months of baseline
- Previous treatment with interferons beta (1a or 1b), or glatiramer acetate within 2 weeks of baseline
- Any previous treatment with mitoxantrone, cladribine, atacicept, alemtuzumab, and daclizumab - Previous treatment with any other immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive medication not already listed above without appropriate washout as described in the applicable local label. If the washout requirements are not described in the applicable local label, then the wash out period must be five times the half-life of the medication
- Any previous treatment with bone marrow transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Any previous history of transplantation or anti-rejection therapy
- Treatment with IV immunoglobulin (Ig) or plasmapheresis within 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Systemic corticosteroid therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Positive screening tests for active, latent, or inadequately treated hepatitis B
- Sensitivity or intolerance to any ingredient (including excipients) of ocrelizumab
- Any additional exclusionary criterion as per ocrelizumab local label, if more stringent than the above
Treatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Random assignment
- Masking
- Double masked
Ocrelizumab Higher Dose
Participants will be randomized to receive a minimum of 5 higher treatment doses based on their body weight at baseline: 1200 mg (participant's body weight \<75 kilograms \[kg\]) or 1800 mg (participant's body weight ≥ 75 kg) of ocrelizumab administered by IV infusion Q24W in the DBT phase. During the optional OLE phase, participants will continue with their assigned dose of ocrelizumab (either 1200 or 1800 mg) for approximately 96 weeks (4 doses in total). Mandatory methylprednisolone (or equivalent) and antihistaminic drug (e.g., diphenhydramine or equivalent) will be administered approximately 30-60 minutes prior to the start of each ocrelizumab infusion.
Drug: Ocrelizumab · Drug: Antihistamine · Drug: Methylprednisolone
Ocrelizumab Approved Dose
Participants will be randomized to receive a minimum of 5 treatment doses of 600 mg ocrelizumab administered by IV infusion Q24W in the DBT phase. During the optional OLE phase, participants will be offered a higher dose of ocrelizumab (either 1200 or 1800 mg), based on their body weight at OLE baseline, for approximately 96 weeks (4 doses in total). Mandatory methylprednisolone (or equivalent) and antihistaminic drug (e.g., diphenhydramine or equivalent) will be administered approximately 30-60 minutes prior to the start of each ocrelizumab infusion.
Drug: Ocrelizumab · Drug: Antihistamine · Drug: Methylprednisolone
Ocrelizumab DRUG
The actual higher dose of ocrelizumab will be assigned to participants based on their body weight at baseline: 1200 mg (body weight \<75 kg) or 1800 mg (body weight ≥ 75 kg). The first dose of ocrelizumab will be administered as two 600 mg or 900 mg IV infusions given 14 days apart. For the subsequent doses, ocrelizumab will be administered as a single 1200 mg or 1800 mg IV infusion Q24W. During the optional OLE phase, participants will continue with their assigned dose of ocrelizumab (either 1200 or 1800 mg) for approximately 96 weeks (4 doses in total).
Ocrelizumab DRUG
Ocrelizumab will be administered at a dose of 600 mg Q24W. The first dose of ocrelizumab will be administered as two 300 mg IV infusions given 14 days apart. For the subsequent doses, ocrelizumab will be administered as a single 600 mg IV infusion Q24W.
Antihistamine DRUG
Premedication with oral or IV antihistaminic drug (i.e., diphenhydramine 50 mg or an equivalent dose of an alternative) will be administered prior to each ocrelizumab infusion.
Methylprednisolone DRUG
Premedication with 100 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) will be administered by IV infusion prior to each ocrelizumab infusion.
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
Time to Onset of 12-week Composite Confirmed Disability Progression (cCDP12)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
Time to onset of 12-week cCDP=first occurrence of a 12-week cCDP according to at least 1 of the 3 criteria: 1) CDP=12-week confirmed increase (CI) from baseline (FB) in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of ≥1.0 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or 12-week CI≥0.5 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of \>5.5 OR 2) 12-week CI of ≥20% FB in Timed 25-foot Walk Test (T25FWT) score OR 3)12-week CI of ≥ 20% FB in 9-hole Peg Test (9-HPT) score. EDSS = disability scale that ranges in 0.5-point steps from 0 \[normal\]-10.0 \[death\]. In T25FWT test participants walked to a 25 foot course as quickly \& safely as possible. Score = average of 2 completed trials (in seconds). In 9-HPT, participants had to place \& remove pegs 1 by 1 into 9 holes arranged in a board \& complete 2 successful trials for each hand \& the amount of time (in seconds) required was recorded. In T25FWT \& 9-HPT the longer it took complete test= higher scores, indicating deterioration.
Secondary measures
Time to Onset of 24-week cCDP (cCDP24)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
Time to onset of a 24 week cCDP=first occurrence of a 24-week cCDP according to at least 1 of 3 criteria: 1) CDP=24-week CI from baseline in EDSS score of ≥1.0 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or 24-week CI≥0.5 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of \>5.5 OR 2) 24-week CI of ≥20% FB in T25FWT score OR 3) 24-week CI of ≥ 20% FB in 9-HPT score. EDSS = disability scale that ranges in 0.5-point steps from 0 \[normal\]-10.0 \[death\]. In T25FWT test participants walked to a 25 foot course as quickly \& safely as possible. Score = average of 2 completed trials (in seconds). In 9-HPT, participants had to place \& remove pegs 1 by 1 into 9 holes arranged in a board \& complete 2 successful trials for each hand \& the amount of time (in seconds) required was recorded. In T25FWT \& 9-HPT the longer it took complete test= higher scores, indicating deterioration.
Time to Onset of 48-week cCDP (cCDP48)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
Time to onset of a 48-week cCDP=first occurrence of a 48-week cCDP according to at least 1 of 3 criteria: 1) CDP=48-week CI from baseline in EDSS score of ≥1.0 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or 48-week CI≥0.5 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of \>5.5 OR 2) 48-week CI of ≥20% FB in T25FWT score OR 3) 48-week CI of ≥ 20% FB in 9-HPT score. EDSS = disability scale that ranges in 0.5-point steps from 0 \[normal\]-10.0 \[death\]. In T25FWT test participants walked to a 25 foot course as quickly \& safely as possible. Score = average of 2 completed trials (in seconds). In 9-HPT, participants had to place \& remove pegs 1 by 1 into 9 holes arranged in a board \& complete 2 successful trials for each hand \& the amount of time (in seconds) required was recorded. In T25FWT \& 9-HPT the longer it took complete test= higher scores, indicating deterioration.
Time to Onset of cCDP12 Independent of Protocol-defined Relapses (PDR) or Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
Time to onset of 12-week cCDP=first occurrence of a 12-week cCDP according to at least 1 of 3 criteria: 1) CDP=12-week CI from baseline in EDSS score of ≥1.0 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or 12-week CI≥0.5 point in participants with baseline EDSS score of \>5.5 OR 2) 12-week CI of ≥20% FB in T25FWT score OR 3) 12-week CI of ≥ 20% FB in 9-HPT score. EDSS score, T25FWT \& 9-HPT are the same as defined in primary outcome measure. Protocol-defined relapse=occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS and immediately preceded by a relatively stable or improving neurological state of at least 30 days. Symptoms persist for at least 24 hours \& accompanied by objective neurological worsening consistent with an increase of one of the following: Half a step (0.5 point) on the EDSS; Two points on one of the functional system scores (FSS) (pyramidal, ambulation, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, or visual); One point on ≥2 more of the FSS.
Time to Onset of 12-week Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP12)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
CDP was defined as a 12-week confirmed increase from baseline in EDSS score of ≥1.0 point in participants with a baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or a 12-week CI ≥0.5 points in participants with a baseline EDSS score of \>5.5. The EDSS was used to measure changes in the disability level of participants with MS over time. EDSS is based on a standard neurological examination, incorporating functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel and bladder, and cerebral \[or mental\]) that are rated and then scored as a FSS, and ambulation, which is scored as ambulation score. Each FSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale where score range from 0 to 5 or 6, and ambulation score that is rated from 0 to 16. These ratings along with observations and assistive devices were then used to determine the total EDSS score. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10.0 (death) in 0.5-point steps.
Time to ≥ 20% Increase in 12-week Confirmed T25FWT
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
T25FWT test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed based on a timed 25-foot walk. The participant was directed to start at one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly and safely as possible. The Examining Investigator timed the participants from the start of the walk to the end of the 25 feet. The task was immediately administered again by having the participant walk back the same distance. Participants could use assistive devices (e.g., cane, crutch, or rollator) when performing the task. Score was the average of the two completed trials, measured in seconds. The longer it takes to walk, higher the score, indicating deterioration. A 20% change from baseline of the averaged T25FWT was considered clinically meaningful.
Annual Rate of Percent Change From Baseline in Total Brain Volume
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
Brain volume was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Mean difference in annual rate of percent change from baseline in total brain volume between the higher and approved dose of ocrelizumab arms in participants with RMS where no treatment discontinuation nor initiation of alternative MS treatment occurred, are reported.
Time to Onset of 12-week Confirmed 4-point Worsening in Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
The SDMT is a performance measure that demonstrated sensitivity in detecting the presence of cognitive impairment and changes in cognitive functioning over time \& in response to treatment. The SDMT presents a series of nine symbols, each paired with a single digit in a key at the top of a standard sheet of paper. Participants were asked to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures within 90 seconds. Responses were collected orally. The score is the number of correctly paired items in 90 seconds with a maximum score of 110 and minimum of 0. Higher scores indicate improvement. A four-point change from baseline was considered clinically meaningful.
Time to Onset of 24-week Confirmed 8-point Increase in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
The MSWS-12 was a 12-item self-report measure of the impact of MS on the participant's ability to walk during the past 2 weeks. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely likely). Scores were summed and linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating greater impact of MS on walking ability. An 8-point change was considered clinically meaningful.
Fold Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Light (NfL) Chain at Week 48 for Participants Assigned to the Higher Dose Ocrelizumab Group
Time frame: Week 48
NfL is a biomarker of neuroinflammation in CSF. Ratio of change from baseline in NfL at Week 48 for RMS participants where no treatment discontinuation nor initiation of alternative MS treatment occurred within the ocrelizumab higher dose arm has been reported. The results correspond to fold change from baseline (ie ratio of adjusted geometric means at week 48 vs baseline).
Fold Change From Baseline in NfL Chain at Week 48 for Participants Assigned to the Approved Dose Ocrelizumab Group
Time frame: Week 48
NfL is a biomarker of neuroinflammation in CSF. Ratio of change from baseline in NfL at Week 48 for RMS participants where no treatment discontinuation nor initiation of alternative MS treatment occurred within the ocrelizumab approved dose arm has been reported. The results correspond to fold change from baseline (ie ratio of adjusted geometric means at week 48 vs baseline).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From initiation of study drug up to approximately 4 years
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Ocrelizumab Over the First Dosing Interval
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 24
Not reported in this registry record.
B-cell Levels in Blood
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, and 192
Not reported in this registry record.
Percent Change From Baseline in B-cell Levels
Time frame: Weeks 2, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, and 192
Not reported in this registry record.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≤ 5 B-cells/μL of Blood
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, and 192
Not reported in this registry record.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ocrelizumab
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years
Prevalence of ADAs at baseline was defined as the percentage of participants that is ADA positive at baseline. For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. Percentages have been rounded off.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (121)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
121 locations
North Central Neurology AssociatesCullman, Alabama, United StatesStatus unknown
Alabama Neurology AssociatesHomewood, Alabama, United StatesStatus unknown
21st Century NeurologyPhoenix, Arizona, United StatesStatus unknown
Profound Research, LLCCarlsbad, California, United StatesStatus unknown
Stanford University Medical CenterStanford, California, United StatesStatus unknown
Advanced Neurology of Colorado, LLCFort Collins, Colorado, United StatesStatus unknown
Neurology Associates, PAMaitland, Florida, United StatesStatus unknown
University of South FloridaTampa, Florida, United StatesStatus unknown
American Health Network Institute, LLCAvon, Indiana, United StatesStatus unknown
University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas City, Kansas, United StatesStatus unknown
The NeuroMedical Clinic of Central LouisianaAlexandria, Louisiana, United StatesStatus unknown
Maine Medical CenterScarborough, Maine, United StatesStatus unknown
Dragonfly Research, LLCWellesley, Massachusetts, United StatesStatus unknown
Henry Ford Health SystemDetroit, Michigan, United StatesStatus unknown
Washington University School of MedicineSt Louis, Missouri, United StatesStatus unknown
Cleveland Clinic Lou RuvoLas Vegas, Nevada, United StatesStatus unknown
Dent Neurological InstituteAmherst, New York, United StatesStatus unknown
UC Health NeurologyDayton, Ohio, United StatesStatus unknown
Oklahoma Medical Research FoundationOklahoma City, Oklahoma, United StatesStatus unknown
Abington Neurological AssociatesWillow Grove, Pennsylvania, United StatesStatus unknown
Tri-State Mountain NeurologyJohnson City, Tennessee, United StatesStatus unknown
Hope NeurologyKnoxville, Tennessee, United StatesStatus unknown
Bhupesh Dihenia M.D. P.A.Lubbock, Texas, United StatesStatus unknown
Lone Star Neurology of San AntonioSan Antonio, Texas, United StatesStatus unknown
Evergreen MS CenterKirkland, Washington, United StatesStatus unknown
Centro de Especialidades Neurológicas y Rehabilitación - CENyRBuenos Aires, ArgentinaStatus unknown
CEMICBuenos Aires, ArgentinaStatus unknown
Centro de Investigaciones Médicas TucumanSan Miguel de Tucumán, ArgentinaStatus unknown
Austin HospitalHeidelberg, Victoria, AustraliaStatus unknown
Hospital ErasmeBrussels, BelgiumStatus unknown
Revalidatie en MS CentrumOverpelt, BelgiumStatus unknown
Instituto de Neurologia de CuritibaCuritiba, Paraná, BrazilStatus unknown
IMV Pesquisa NeurológicaPorto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilStatus unknown
Clinica NeurologicaJoinville, Santa Catarina, BrazilStatus unknown
CPQuali Pesquisa Clinica LtdaSão Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilStatus unknown
Recherche Sepmus Inc.Greenfield Park, Quebec, CanadaStatus unknown
Centre de Recherche Saint-LouisLévis, Quebec, CanadaStatus unknown
Rigshospitalet GlostrupGlostrup Municipality, DenmarkStatus unknown
Groupe Hospitalier PellegrinBordeaux, FranceStatus unknown
CHU Hopital Gabriel MontpiedClermont-Ferrand, FranceStatus unknown
CH St Vincent de PaulLille, FranceStatus unknown
Hôpital Charles NicolleRouen, FranceStatus unknown
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, GermanyStatus unknown
St. Josef-Hospital, Klinik für NeurologieBochum, GermanyStatus unknown
Universitätsklinikum "Carl Gustav Carus", Zentrum für Klinische NeurowissenschaftenDresden, GermanyStatus unknown
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-HolsteinKiel, GermanyStatus unknown
Universität LeipzigLeipzig, GermanyStatus unknown
Universitätsklinikum UlmUlm, GermanyStatus unknown
Deutsche Klinik für DiagnostikWiesbaden, GermanyStatus unknown
401 Military Hospital of AthensAthens, GreeceStatus unknown
S-Medicon Egeszsegugyi Szolgaltato Kft.Budapest, HungaryStatus unknown
UNO Medical Trials Kft.Budapest, HungaryStatus unknown
Somogy Vármegyei Kaposi Mór Oktató KórházKaposvár, HungaryStatus unknown
Universita? G. D'AnnunzioChieti, Abruzzo, ItalyStatus unknown
AOU Seconda Università degli StudiNaples, Campania, ItalyStatus unknown
AOU Seconda Università degli StudiNaples, Campania, ItalyStatus unknown
Policlinico Tor Vergata Dip. Neuroscienze-Clinica Neurologica-UOSD Sclerosi MultiplaRome, Lazio, ItalyStatus unknown
NCL Institute NeuroscienceRome, Lazio, ItalyStatus unknown
Policlinico Umberto IRome, Lazio, ItalyStatus unknown
Fond. Istituto Neurologico C.BestaMilan, Lombardy, ItalyStatus unknown
IRCCS Istituto Neurologico NeuromedPozzilli, Molise, ItalyStatus unknown
Hospital IV Alberto Sabogal SologurenBellavista, PeruStatus unknown
Clinica InternacionalLima, PeruStatus unknown
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Neurológicas - Hospital MogrovejoLima, PeruStatus unknown
Hospital Maria AuxiliadoraLima, PeruStatus unknown
Hospital Nacional Dos de MayoLima, PeruStatus unknown
Clinica Sanchez FerrerTrujillo, PeruStatus unknown
Neurocentrum Bydgoszcz sp. z o.oBydgoszcz, PolandStatus unknown
COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o. o. Szpital im. M. KopernikaGdansk, PolandStatus unknown
MA-LEK Clinical Sp. Z o.o.Katowice, PolandStatus unknown
SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szp. Klin. nr1 im.N.Barlickiego UMLodz, PolandStatus unknown
Centrum Neurologii Krzysztof SelmajLodz, PolandStatus unknown
Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. Dr Hab. N. Med. Konrad Rejdak.Lublin, PolandStatus unknown
Neurologiczny Niepubliczny ZOZ Centrum Leczenia SM Osrodek Bada? KlinicznychPlewiska, PolandStatus unknown
EMC Instytut Medyczny SAPóźna, PolandStatus unknown
Nmedis sp. z o.o.Rzeszów, PolandStatus unknown
Osrodek Badan Klinicznych EuromedisSzczecin, PolandStatus unknown
Centrum Medyczne NeuroProtectWarsaw, PolandStatus unknown
Klinika Neurologii I Wydzialu Lekarskiego WUM w WarszawieWarsaw, PolandStatus unknown
Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii II Klinika NeurologicznaWarsaw, PolandStatus unknown
Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny - Pa?Stwowy Instytut BadawczyWarsaw, PolandStatus unknown
Hospital de BragaBraga, PortugalStatus unknown
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental - Hospital Egas MonizLisbon, PortugalStatus unknown
Hospital de Santa MariaLisbon, PortugalStatus unknown
FSBHI Siberian Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological AgencyKrasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, RussiaStatus unknown
Neiro Clinica LLCMoscow, Moscow Oblast, RussiaStatus unknown
Research Center of Neurology of RAMSMoscow, Moscow Oblast, RussiaStatus unknown
Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologiesMoskva, Moscow Oblast, RussiaStatus unknown
City Clinical Hospital #24Moskva, Moscow Oblast, RussiaStatus unknown
SBIH City Clinical Hospital #31Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, RussiaStatus unknown
N.P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human BrainSaint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, RussiaStatus unknown
City Hospital #40 of Kurortniy Administrative DistrictSaint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, RussiaStatus unknown
SHI Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital #1Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, RussiaStatus unknown
Vertebronevrologiya LLCKazan', Tatarstan Republic, RussiaStatus unknown
KSMU Interregional Clinical Diagnostic CentreKazan', Tatarstan Republic, RussiaStatus unknown
Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical HospitalUlyanovsk, Ulyanovsk Oblast, RussiaStatus unknown
Saratov State Medical University of RosZdravSaratov, RussiaStatus unknown
Nebbiolo Center for Clinical TrialsTomsk, RussiaStatus unknown
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC)A Coruña, LA Coruna, SpainStatus unknown
Hospital Quiron de MadridPozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, SpainStatus unknown
Hospital Alvaro CunqueiroVigo, Pontevedra, SpainStatus unknown
Hospital Universitari Vall d'HebronBarcelona, SpainStatus unknown
Hospital Puerta del MarCadiz, SpainStatus unknown
Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga ? Hospital GeneralMálaga, SpainStatus unknown
Universitätsspital Basel Medizin NeurologieBasel, SwitzerlandStatus unknown
Inselspital Bern Medizin NeurologieBern, SwitzerlandStatus unknown
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano - CivicoLugano, SwitzerlandStatus unknown
Kocaeli University HospitalKocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown
5th Cherkasy City Center of Primary Health CareCherkasy, UkraineStatus unknown
Mun.Med.Proph.Inst.?Chernihiv Reg.Hosp.?Chernihiv, UkraineStatus unknown
Bukovinsky SMU RMI Chernivtsi RCHChernivtsi, UkraineStatus unknown
SI USSRI of Medical and Social Problems of Disabilities of MOHUDnipro, UkraineStatus unknown
Regional Clinical HospitalIvano-Frankivsk, UkraineStatus unknown
Municipal Nonprofit Enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical HospitalKharkiv, UkraineStatus unknown
St.In.Inst. of Neurol.Psych.and Narcol.of the AMSUKharkiv, UkraineStatus unknown
Medical Center of Private Execution First Private ClinicKyiv, UkraineStatus unknown
Medical Center Dopomoga PlusKyiv, UkraineStatus unknown
Lvivska oblasna tsentralna likarniaLviv, UkraineStatus unknown
LCC "Medical center "Unimed"Zaporizhzhya, UkraineStatus unknown
Municipal Non-profit Enterprise Zaporizhzhya Regional Hospital Zaporizhzhya Regional CouncilZaporizhzhya, UkraineStatus unknown
Derriford HospitalPlymouth, United KingdomStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Study start
- Nov 26, 2020 Actual
- Primary completion
- Dec 19, 2024 Actual
- Study completion
- Apr 1, 2027 Estimated
- First posted
- Sep 10, 2020 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
A Phase IIIb Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Higher Dose of Ocrelizumab in Adults With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
