Safety and Diagnostic Efficacy of Mangoral in Participants With Focal Liver Lesions and Reduced Kidney Function
Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions · Severe Renal Impairment
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Age range
- 18 years - Not specified
- Sex eligible
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Participants
- 87 Actual
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and diagnostic efficacy of Mangoral in liver MRI in participants with known or suspected focal liver lesions and severe renal impairment. The diagnostic efficacy of Mangoral will be assessed in terms of visualization of detected focal liver lesions in combined MRI (CMRI: combined Mangoral-enhanced and unenhanced MRI) compared to unenhanced MRI.
Read the full description
The overall objective of this multicenter, open-label, study is to evaluate the safety and diagnostic efficacy of Mangoral in participants with known or suspected focal liver lesions and severe renal impairment. Study treatment is a single oral dose of Mangoral (800 mg manganese chloride \[II\] tetrahydrate, 500 mg L-alanine, and 800 IU vitamin D3). Adult male and female participants with severe renal impairment or acute kidney injury and who are being evaluated for known or suspected focal liver lesions will be included. Primary diagnostic efficacy in terms of visualization of detected lesions will be evaluated centrally by 3 independent readers. Study MRIs will also be evaluated by the on-site radiologists for the assessment of secondary objectives and for clinical purposes.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female participants 18 years and older.
- Known or suspected focal liver lesions based on medical history and previous laboratory and/or imaging examinations.
- Severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) based on medical history and previous laboratory examinations, at least once, within the last 3 months prior to the Baseline Visit, or participants with an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or ≥ 50% within 7 days prior to the Baseline Visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with simple liver cysts only.
- Any investigational drug or device within 6 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Any magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast media within 6 weeks prior to Baseline Visit or scheduled to receive any contrast medium before the last study visit.
- Participants with severe hepatic impairment (according to Child-Pugh score C).
- Participants scheduled for surgery before last study visit.
- Participants with encephalopathy / neurodegenerative or acute neurological disorders.
- Participants with hemochromatosis.
Treatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Not applicable
- Masking
- No masking
Mangoral
All participants will receive a single dose of Mangoral (800 mg Manganese (II) chloride tetrahydrate \[MnCl2 4H2O\]).
Drug: Mangoral
Mangoral DRUG
800 mg manganese chloride \[II\] tetrahydrate, 500 mg L-alanine, and 800 IU vitamin D3
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
Co-primary Endpoint: Lesion Border Delineation in Combined MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); combined MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0) and 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Visualization of focal liver lesions was measured by 2 co-primary variables: 'lesion border delineation' and 'lesion contrast' compared to liver background. Qualitative assessment determined on the 4-point scales for up to 15 lesions per participant. Each lesion was assessed for lesion border delineation from 1 (poor: lesion border is poorly distinct) to 4 (excellent: lesion border is sharply and clearly distinct). Central reading sessions were undertaken by 3 independent, blinded readers.
The scores were calculated for each participant by summing the individual lesion scores and calculating the mean. The total score could range from 1 to 4 for each participant with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Co-primary Endpoint: Lesion Contrast in Combined MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); combined MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0) and 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Visualization of focal liver lesions was measured by 2 co-primary variables: 'lesion border delineation' and 'lesion contrast' compared to liver background. Qualitative assessment determined on the 4-point scales for up to 15 lesions per participant. Each lesion was assessed for lesion contrast from 1 (poor: difference in signal intensity between the lesion and the surrounding normal liver tissue is poor) to 4 (excellent: difference in signal intensity between the lesion and the surrounding liver is marked). Central reading sessions were undertaken by 3 independent, blinded readers.
The scores were calculated for each participant by summing the individual lesion scores and calculating the mean. The total score could range from 1 to 4 for each participant with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Secondary measures
Number of Lesions Detected by Each MRI Method
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0; and combined MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0) and 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Assessments of unenhanced MRI, mangoral-enhanced MRI, and combined MRI for detection of lesions were undertaken by on-site readers (assessing participants at their own site) and during central reading sessions by 3 independent, blinded readers.
Lesion Border Delineation in Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Visualization of focal liver lesions was measured by variables: 'lesion border delineation' and 'lesion contrast' compared to liver background. Qualitative assessment determined on the 4-point scales for up to 15 lesions per participant. Each lesion was assessed for lesion border delineation from 1 (poor: lesion border is poorly distinct) to 4 (excellent: lesion border is sharply and clearly distinct). Central reading sessions were undertaken by 3 independent, blinded readers.
The scores were calculated for each participant by summing the individual lesion scores and calculating the mean. The total score could range from 1 to 4 for each participant with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Lesion Contrast in Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Visualization of focal liver lesions was measured by variables: 'lesion border delineation' and 'lesion contrast' compared to liver background. Qualitative assessment determined on the 4-point scales for up to 15 lesions per participant. Each lesion was assessed for lesion contrast from 1 (poor: difference in signal intensity between the lesion and the surrounding normal liver tissue is poor) to 4 (excellent: difference in signal intensity between the lesion and the surrounding liver is marked). Central reading sessions were undertaken by 3 independent, blinded readers.
The scores were calculated for each participant by summing the individual lesion scores and calculating the mean. The total score could range from 1 to 4 for each participant with higher scores representing a better outcome.
Confidence in Lesion Detection Score
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0; and combined MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0) and 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Each lesion was evaluated on a 3-point scale: 1 (lesion is detected with low confidence), 2 (lesion is detected with moderate confidence), 3 (lesion is detected with high confidence). Higher confidence in lesion detection scores represent better outcomes.
Assessments of unenhanced MRI, mangoral-enhanced MRI, and combined MRI for confidence in lesion detection were undertaken by on-site readers (assessing participants are their own site) and during central reading sessions by 3 independent, blinded readers.
Confidence in Lesion Localization Score
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0; and combined MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0) and 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Each lesion was evaluated on a 3-point scale: 1 (lesion is localized to a liver segment with low confidence), 2 (lesion is localized to a liver segment with moderate confidence), 3 (lesion is localized to a liver segment with high confidence).
Assessments of unenhanced MRI, mangoral-enhanced MRI, and combined MRI for confidence in lesion localization were undertaken by on-site readers (assessing participants at their own site) and during central reading sessions by 3 independent, blinded readers.
Longest Diameter of Largest and Smallest Lesion
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Assessments of unenhanced MRI and mangoral-enhanced MRI for lesion dimensions were undertaken during central reading sessions by 3 independent, blinded readers.
Percentage Liver Signal Intensity (SI) Enhancement in Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Quantitative SI was measured by positioning circular regions of interest in a homogenous area in the liver and the assessed liver lesion on the same image. SI liver was defined as the SI of the liver. Liver SI enhancement (%) = (\[SI liver post contrast - SI liver pre contrast\] / \[SI liver pre contrast\]) × 100.
Assessments of unenhanced MRI and mangoral-enhanced MRI for liver SI were undertaken during central reading sessions by the 3 independent, blinded readers.
Liver-to-lesion Contrast (LLC) in Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Quantitative SI was measured by positioning circular regions of interest in a homogenous area in the liver and the assessed liver lesion on the same image. Up to 5 lesions per participant of ≥ 2 cm in diameter were evaluated and these lesions were the same on pre-and post-contrast images. SI lesion was defined as the SI of these lesions. SI liver was defined as the SI of the liver. LLC = (SI liver - SI lesion) / (SI liver + SI lesion). Higher ratio scores represent a better outcome.
Assessments of unenhanced MRI and mangoral-enhanced MRI for LLC ratio were undertaken during central reading sessions by the 3 independent, blinded readers.
Signal-to-noise Ratio (SNR) in Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Quantitative SI was measured by positioning circular regions of interest in a homogenous area in the liver and the assessed liver lesion on the same image. SI liver was defined as the SI of the liver. Standard deviation of the background noise was measured using the largest possible rectangular region of interest vertical to the patient's abdomen in the direction of the phase-encoding gradient. SNR = SI liver / standard deviation noise. Higher ratio scores represent a better outcome.
Assessments of unenhanced MRI and mangoral-enhanced MRI for SNR were undertaken during central reading sessions by the 3 independent, blinded readers.
Contrast-to-noise Ratio (CNR) in Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
Quantitative SI was measured by positioning circular regions of interest in a homogenous area in the liver and the assessed liver lesion on the same image. Up to 5 lesions per participant of ≥ 2 cm in diameter were evaluated and these lesions were the same on pre-and post-contrast images. SI lesion was defined as the SI of these lesions. SI liver was defined as the SI of the liver. Standard deviation of the background noise was measured using the largest possible rectangular region of interest vertical to the patient's abdomen in the direction of the phase-encoding gradient. CNR = (SI liver - mean of SI lesion) / standard deviation noise. Higher ratio scores represent a better outcome.
Assessments of unenhanced MRI and mangoral-enhanced MRI for CNR were undertaken during central reading sessions by the 3 independent, blinded readers.
Number of Participants With Change(s) in Recommended Management Based on Diagnostic Performance of Combined MRI or Mangoral-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI
Time frame: Unenhanced MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0); mangoral-enhanced MRI: 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0; and combined MRI: Baseline Period (Day -1 to Day 0) and 4 hours after mangoral administration on Day 0
A participant was considered to have a change in recommended management when compared to unenhanced MRI if recommended management was different following assessment of the combined MRI or mangoral-enhanced MRI, including next steps in management (i.e. chemotherapy, surgery, local ablation procedure, combination therapy, or other \[specify\]). Recommended patient management from "other" in unenhanced MRI to "other" in combined MRI or mangoral-enhanced MRI was considered not a change regardless of the free text.
Assessments of unenhanced MRI, mangoral-enhanced MRI, and combined MRI for confidence in lesion detection were undertaken by on-site readers (assessing participants at their own site with access to patient records) and during central reading sessions by 3 independent, blinded readers (without access to patient records).
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (60)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
60 locations
Mayo Clinic - ArizonaScottsdale, Arizona, United StatesStatus unknown
University of California at Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical CenterLos Angeles, California, United StatesStatus unknown
Stanford University School of MedicineStanford, California, United StatesStatus unknown
Mayo Clinic - JacksonvilleJacksonville, Florida, United StatesStatus unknown
Schiff Center for Liver DiseasesMiami, Florida, United StatesStatus unknown
University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas City, Kansas, United StatesStatus unknown
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical CenterBaltimore, Maryland, United StatesStatus unknown
Massachusetts General HospitalBoston, Massachusetts, United StatesStatus unknown
Boston University Medical CenterBoston, Massachusetts, United StatesStatus unknown
Saint Louis UniversitySt Louis, Missouri, United StatesStatus unknown
Duke UniversityDurham, North Carolina, United StatesStatus unknown
PanAmerican Clinical Research LLCBrownsville, Texas, United StatesStatus unknown
University of Washington Medical CenterSeattle, Washington, United StatesStatus unknown
University of Wisconsin - MadisonMadison, Wisconsin, United StatesStatus unknown
Fundación IntecnusBariloche, Río Negro Province, ArgentinaStatus unknown
Centro Rossi Body ImagingBuenos Aires, ArgentinaStatus unknown
Sanatorio Allende Nueva CórdobaCórdoba, ArgentinaStatus unknown
Hospital Pablo Tobon UribeMedellín, Antioquia, ColombiaStatus unknown
Clínica Universitaria ColombiaBogotá, Cundinamarca, ColombiaStatus unknown
Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá - Hospital de San JoséBogotá, Cundinamarca, ColombiaStatus unknown
Charité - Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, GermanyStatus unknown
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle RadiologieFrankfurt, GermanyStatus unknown
Universitätsmedizin GöttingenGöttingen, GermanyStatus unknown
Städtisches Klinikum KarlsruheDiagnostische und interventionelle RadiologieKarlsruhe, GermanyStatus unknown
Universitättsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein/Campus KielKlinik für Radiologie und NeuroradiologieKiel, GermanyStatus unknown
Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie Klinikum der Universität München LMU CampusMunich, GermanyStatus unknown
Institut für RöntgendiagnostikRegensburg, GermanyStatus unknown
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST)Milan, Lombardy, ItalyStatus unknown
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S.Orsola-MalpighiBologna, ItalyStatus unknown
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaMilan, ItalyStatus unknown
Ospedale del MareNaples, ItalyStatus unknown
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. PascaleNaples, ItalyStatus unknown
Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRoma, ItalyStatus unknown
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto IRome, ItalyStatus unknown
Ospedale di BelcolleViterbo, ItalyStatus unknown
Panamerican Clinical Research - Cuernavaca Rio MayoCuernavaca, MexicoStatus unknown
Panamerican Clinical Research MexicoGuadalajara, MexicoStatus unknown
Panamerican Clinical Research - Querétaro Avenida Paseo de la RepúblicaQuerétaro, MexicoStatus unknown
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza, Wydział Katedra i Zakład Radiologii i Diagnostyki ObrazowejBydgoszcz, PolandStatus unknown
Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie Zakład Diagnostyki Obrazowej CUMRiK UlKrakow, PolandStatus unknown
EuroMedis Sp. z o.o.Szczecin, PolandStatus unknown
Altay Regional Oncology DispenceryBarnaul, RussiaStatus unknown
State Institution of Healthcare "Regional Oncology Dispensary"Irkutsk, RussiaStatus unknown
Scientific and Research Institute of Oncology named after N.N. BlokhinMoscow, RussiaStatus unknown
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of SurgeryMoscow, RussiaStatus unknown
National Medical Research Radiology Center Named After HerzenMoscow, RussiaStatus unknown
JSC "Avicenna"Novosibirsk, RussiaStatus unknown
State Institution of Healthcare of Omsk regionOmsk, RussiaStatus unknown
SBIH of Pskov Regional Clinical Oncologic DispensaryPskov, RussiaStatus unknown
LLC "Clinica YZI 4D"Pyatigorsk, RussiaStatus unknown
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of OncologySaint Petersburg, RussiaStatus unknown
Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Healthcare InstitutionSaint Petersburg, RussiaStatus unknown
Smolensk Clinical HospitalSmolensk, RussiaStatus unknown
State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the Tyumen RegionTyumen, RussiaStatus unknown
Karolinska University Hospital HuddingeStockholm, SwedenStatus unknown
Ege University Medical Faculty HospitalBornova, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown
Erciyes University Medical Faculty HospitalMelikgazi, Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown
Kocaeli Universityİzmit, Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty HospitalAnkara, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown
İstanbul Üniversitesi - Istanbul Tıp FakültesiIstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)Status unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- Ascelia Pharma AB
- Study start
- Feb 19, 2020 Actual
- Primary completion
- Feb 17, 2023 Actual
- Study completion
- Feb 17, 2023 Actual
- First posted
- Oct 8, 2019 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
A Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Diagnostic Efficacy of Mangoral in Patients With Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions and Severe Renal Impairment
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
