Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Acapatamab in Subjects With mCRPC
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer · Prostate Cancer
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Age range
- 18 years - Not specified
- Sex eligible
- Male
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Participants
- 212 Actual
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
Sponsor Decision
About the research
A phase 1 study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of prostate specific membrane antigen half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager acapatamab in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).
Read the full description
This is a phase I, first-in-human study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of acapatamab; a half-life extended (HLE) bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) construct, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab, etanercept prophylaxis and cytochrome P450 (CYP) phenotyping cocktail in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
All Parts
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has provided informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific activities/procedures
- Subjects with histologically or cytologically confirmed mCRPC who are refractory to a novel antiandrogen therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, and/or apalutamide) and have failed at least 1 (but not more than 2) taxane regimens (or who are deemed medically unsuitable to be treated with a taxane regimen or have actively refused treatment with a taxane regimen). Progression on novel antiandrogen therapy may have occurred in the non-metastatic CRPC setting
- Subjects must have undergone bilateral orchiectomy or must be on continuous ADT with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist
- Total serum testosterone \</= 50 ng/dL or 1.7 nmol/L
- Evidence of progressive disease, defined as 1 or more PCWG3 criteria:
- PSA level \>/= 1 ng/mL that has increased on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 week apart
- nodal or visceral progression as defined by RECIST 1.1 with PCGW3 modifications
- appearance of 2 or more new lesions in bone scan
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 1
- Life expectancy \>/= 6months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any anticancer therapy or immunotherapy within 4 weeks of start of first dose, not including luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH)/GnRH analogue (agonist/antagonist). Subjects on a stable bisophosphonate or denosumab regimen for \>/= 30 days prior to randomization are eligible
- Prior PSMA-targeted therapy (subjects on prior therapy may be eligible if discussed with Amgen medical monitor prior to enrollment)
- Central nervous system (CNS) metastases, leptomeningeal disease, or spinal cord compression
- Active autoimmune disease or any other diseases requiring immunosuppressive therapy while on study
- Needing chronic systemic corticosteroid therapy (prednisone \> 10 mg per day or equivalent) or any other immunosuppressive therapies (including anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF alpha\] therapies) unless stopped 7 days prior to start of first dose
- Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication, and/or symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \> class II) within 12 months of first dose of acapatamab
Part 2 only:
- Subjects on a prior PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor who experienced a Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse event prior to first day of dosing
- History or evidence of interstitial lung disease or active, non-infectious pneumonitis
Part 3 only:
\- Evidence of active tuberculosis on chest radiograph within 3 months prior to the first dose of investigational product
Part 6 only:
Subjects are excluded from this cohort if any of the following additional criteria apply:
- Subjects taking strong OAT3 inhibitors (eg, probenecid) or adjust the dosing to 1 mg PO QD.
- Subjects with latent or active tuberculosis at screening
Treatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Not randomized
- Masking
- No masking
Part 1 Dose-exploration: acapatamab treatment
Part 1 dose-exploration: acapatamab is administered intravenously. The dose-exploration phase of the study will estimate the MTD of acapatamab. RP2D may be identified based on emerging safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic data prior to reaching an MTD.
Drug: acapatamab
Part 1 Dose-expansion: acapatamab treatment
Part 1 dose-expansion: acapatamab is administered intravenously at the MTD/RP2D.
Drug: acapatamab
Part 2: acapatamab + Pembrolizumab
Part 2: acapatamab is administered intravenously at the MTD/RP2D. Pembrolizumab will be administered intravenously.
Drug: acapatamab · Drug: Pembrolizumab
Part 3: acapatamab + Etanercept Prophylaxis
Part 3: acapatamab is administered intravenously at RP2D/MTD levels. Etanercept will be administered subcutaneously in cycle 1 only.
Drug: acapatamab · Drug: Etanercept
Part 4: acapatamab 24 Hour Monitoring
Part 4: acapatamab is administered intravenously at RP2D/MTD with 24-hour monitoring.
Drug: acapatamab
Part 5: acapatamab Outpatient Cohort
Part 5: acapatamab is administered intravenously at RP2D/MTD in an outpatient setting with 8-hour monitoring.
Drug: acapatamab
Part 6: acapatamab + Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Cocktail Drug Interaction
Part 6: acapatamab is administered intravenously at RP2D/MTD. A CYP phenotyping cocktail will be administered orally.
Drug: acapatamab · Drug: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Cocktail
acapatamab DRUG
Investigational immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Pembrolizumab DRUG
Combined with acapatamab for investigational treatment of mCRPC
Etanercept DRUG
Prophylaxis for acapatamab-related cytokine release syndrome.
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Cocktail DRUG
Evaluate the effect of co-administration of multiple dosing of acapatamab on plasma
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
Number of Participants With a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)- Parts 1 and 2
Time frame: Day 1 to 28 of Cycle 1 (length of cycle is 28 days)
DLTs are defined as any adverse event with an onset within first 28 days following first dose of AMG 160 monotherapy (Part 1) or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 2) with any of the following criteria unless clearly attributable to causes other than AMG 160 treatment: • grade 5 toxicity (eg, death not due to disease progression)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, or start of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first
A treatment-emergent adverse event is one that occurs on or after the first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days after the last dose. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Any clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory tests were recorded as adverse events.
Secondary measures
Objective Response (OR) Rate- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
OR was defined as a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, confirmed by a repeat assessment at least 4 weeks later. Participants who did not experience a PR/CR or did not have any follow-up tumor assessments were regarded as non-responders.
Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
A PSA response (PSA 30) is defined as a ≥ 30% reduction from the baseline PSA, (PSA 50) is defined as a ≥ 50% reduction from the baseline PSA, (PSA 70) is defined as a ≥ 70% reduction from the baseline PSA, and (PSA 90) is defined as a ≥ 90% reduction from the baseline PSA. PSA response must be confirmed by a second consecutive value ≥ 3 weeks later.
Duration of Response (DOR)-RECIST 1.1- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
DOR is defined as the time from the date of an initial objective response per RECIST 1.1 to the earlier of progression or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis had DOR censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment.
Duration of PSA Response- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
PSA DOR is defined as the time from the date of an initial PSA response (PSA 50) to the earlier of PSA progression or death. Subjects who have not ended their response at the time of analysis will have PSA DOR censored on the date of their last PSA measurement. This endpoint only applies to subjects with a PSA response (PSA 50).
Percentage of Participants With 68Gallium (68Ga)-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Response Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Up to 3 years
A Gallium PSMA-11 response is a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) using 68Gallium (68Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).
Percentage of Participants With F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Response- Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Up to 3 years
A FDG PET response is a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the maximum SUV using 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Time to Progression (Radiographic)- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time to radiographic progression is defined as the time from study Day 1 until the first documentation of radiographic disease progression in the absence of subsequent anticancer therapy. Time to radiographic progression will be censored at the last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment prior to subsequent anti-cancer therapy; otherwise, at study Day 1.
Time to Progression (PSA)- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time to PSA progression is defined as the interval from study Day 1 to PSA progression; otherwise, time to PSA progression is censored on the date of the last PSA measurement. If a participant has no baseline or no post-baseline PSA measurement, time to PSA progression will be censored at study Day 1.
Progression Free Survival (Radiographic)- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) is defined as the interval from study day 1 to the earlier of a radiographic progression or death from any cause; otherwise, rPFS is censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment date. If a subject has no post-baseline radiographic tumor assessment and a vital status of alive or unknown, rPFS will be censored at study day 1.
Progression Free Survival (PSA)- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
PSA PFS is defined as the interval from study day 1 to the earlier of a PSA progression or death from any cause; otherwise, PSA PFS is censored on the date of the last PSA measurement. If a subject has no baseline or no post-baseline PSA measurement and a vital status of alive or unknown, PSA PFS will be censored at study day 1.
Overall Survival- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of study Day 1 until death due to any cause.
Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell Response (CTC0)- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
CTC0 is defined as reduction of CTCs \> 0 to 0 at any post-baseline measurement. CTC0 response is applicable only for participants with baseline CTC \> 0.
Percentage of Participants With CTC Conversion- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
CTC conversion is defined as ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 mL blood to ≤ 4 CTCs/7.5 mL blood at any post-baseline measurement. CTC conversion is applicable only for subjects with baseline CTC ≥ 5..
Time to Symptomatic Skeletal Events (SSE)- Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Time to SSE is defined as time from study day 1 to the first SSE. Otherwise, SSE is censored at the last dose date of AMG 160 or pembrolizumab or end of safety follow up date, whichever is later.
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 160 - Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; Cycle 2 Days 1 and 15 (sampling pre-dose up to 168 hours post-dose)
Serum concentrations of AMG 160 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for the estimation of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.0500 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
PK parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, AUClast, AUCtau, t1/2,z, were not estimated for Parts 4 and 5 because the PK sampling schedule in these parts was sparse and not designed to support parameter estimation.
Time to Cmax (Tmax) of AMG 160- Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; Cycle 2 Days 1 and 15 (sampling pre-dose up to 696 hours)
Serum concentrations of AMG 160 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for the estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0500 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
Actual time post dose was used for calculations.
PK parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, AUClast, AUCtau, t1/2,z, were not estimated for Parts 4 and 5 because the PK sampling schedule in these parts was sparse and not designed to support parameter estimation.
Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AMG 160- Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; Cycle 2 Days 1 and 15 (sampling pre-dose up to 168 hours post-dose))
Serum concentrations of AMG 160 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for the estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0500 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
PK parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, AUClast, AUCtau, t1/2,z, were not estimated for Parts 4 and 5 because the PK sampling schedule in these parts was sparse and not designed to support parameter estimation.
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of AMG 160- Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; Cycle 2 Days 1 and 15 (sampling pre-dose up to 168 hours post-dose))
Serum concentrations of AMG 160 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for the estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0500 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
PK parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, AUClast, AUCtau, t1/2,z, were not estimated for Parts 4 and 5 because the PK sampling schedule in these parts was sparse and not designed to support parameter estimation.
AUC Over the Dosing Interval (AUCtau)- Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; Cycle 2 Days 1 and 15 (sampling pre-dose up to 168 hours post-dose)
Serum concentrations of AMG 160 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for the estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0500 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
PK parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, AUClast, AUCtau, t1/2,z, were not estimated for Parts 4 and 5 because the PK sampling schedule in these parts was sparse and not designed to support parameter estimation.
Terminal Half-life (t1/2,z) of AMG 160- Parts 1, 2, and 3
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; Cycle 2 Days 1 and 15 (sampling pre-dose up to 168 hours post-dose)
Serum concentrations of AMG 160 were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis was performed for the estimation of PK parameters. Concentrations below the LLOQ (0.0500 ng/mL) were set to zero before data analysis.
PK parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, AUClast, AUCtau, t1/2,z, were not estimated for Parts 4 and 5 because the PK sampling schedule in these parts was sparse and not designed to support parameter estimation.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (30)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
30 locations
El Camino HospitalCampbell, California, United StatesStatus unknown
City of Hope National Medical CenterDuarte, California, United StatesStatus unknown
City of Hope at Long Beach ElmLong Beach, California, United StatesStatus unknown
University of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, California, United StatesStatus unknown
Emory UniversityAtlanta, Georgia, United StatesStatus unknown
Indiana UniversityIndianapolis, Indiana, United StatesStatus unknown
University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa City, Iowa, United StatesStatus unknown
Tulane Medical CenterNew Orleans, Louisiana, United StatesStatus unknown
Washington UniversitySt Louis, Missouri, United StatesStatus unknown
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of NevadaLas Vegas, Nevada, United StatesStatus unknown
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York, New York, United StatesStatus unknown
Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew York, New York, United StatesStatus unknown
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, Texas, United StatesStatus unknown
Chris OBrien LifehouseCamperdown, New South Wales, AustraliaStatus unknown
Scientia Clinical Research LtdRandwick, New South Wales, AustraliaStatus unknown
Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreParkville, Victoria, AustraliaStatus unknown
Ordensklinikum Linz ElisabethinenLinz, AustriaStatus unknown
Landeskrankenhaus SalzburgSalzburg, AustriaStatus unknown
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brueder WienVienna, AustriaStatus unknown
Universitaetsklinikum Allgemeines Krankenhaus WienVienna, AustriaStatus unknown
Universite Catholique de Louvain Cliniques Universitaires Saint LucBrussels, BelgiumStatus unknown
Universitair Ziekenhuis GentGhent, BelgiumStatus unknown
BC Cancer VancouverVancouver, British Columbia, CanadaStatus unknown
Institut Gustave RoussyVillejuif, FranceStatus unknown
National Cancer Center Hospital EastKashiwa-shi, Chiba, JapanStatus unknown
Yokohama City University Medical CenterYokohama, Kanagawa, JapanStatus unknown
Erasmus Medisch CentrumRotterdam, NetherlandsStatus unknown
National University HospitalSingapore, SingaporeStatus unknown
National Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore, SingaporeStatus unknown
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital of Chang Gung Medical FoundationTaoyuan, TaiwanStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Study start
- Feb 5, 2019 Actual
- Primary completion
- Jun 29, 2023 Actual
- Study completion
- Jun 29, 2023 Actual
- First posted
- Jan 3, 2019 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Half-life Extended Bispecific T-cell Engager Acapatamab in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 10, 2026
