Drainage of Tubo - Ovarian Abscess: DTOA
Tubo-ovarian Abscess
What this study involves
The registry does not currently label this study as recruiting. Ask about its status before planning a screening visit.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Age range
- 18 years - 43 years
- Sex eligible
- Female
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Participants
- 80 Actual
These are starting points, not an eligibility decision. The research team must review the full requirements.
About the research
The treatment of the acute phase of the complicated abscess tubo-ovarian relies on antibiotics more or less associated with surgical management in case of visible abscess, poor clinical tolerance (sepsis) and resistance to medical treatment. The CNGOF recommended in 2012 that the tubo-ovarian abscess are not within one antibiotic, and should be drained by interventional radiology, preferably by transvaginal or laparoscopic.
Furthermore the efficiency of drainage by ultrasound puncture performed vaginally was demonstrated. This approach tends to replace the first laparoscopy because of its less invasive, fast, easy to access, more acceptable and less cost compared to laparoscopy. This approach is recommended by the French and English colleges.
In total, the surgery in case of ATO is necessary, it is always coupled with antibiotics. Several surgical approaches are possible, laparotomy, laparoscopy and ultrasound-guided puncture. No prospective comparative study has been done, for which we want to develop this study.
Read the full description
Retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these two supported relate the same cure rates between the two techniques. According to the literature of Garbin O.and al in 2012, the success rate of transvaginal puncture is generally 93.6%. The largest series of Gjelland al in 2005 and covers 302 consecutive patients with ATO who underwent triple antibiotic therapy and transvaginal puncture, the success rate was 93.4%. The failures that required surgical management have frequently revealed endometriosis or cancer. To support laparoscopic, Raiga and al in 1996 studied the support of 36 retrospectively patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional and wash the abscess with a success rate of 100%. Moreover Reich and al in 1987 found 90% success on a review of 25 patients.
The transvaginal echo guided puncture to replace the first laparoscopy because of its less invasive nature, this is a simple act, fast, possible under mild sedation, the cost is still lower than laparoscopy. Some uncontrolled retrospective studies suggest that laparoscopy remains associated with prolongation of hospitalization time, it is also mentioned that the transvaginal puncture is better tolerated by the patient.
No study has compared these two techniques, which is why we propose this study.
Who may be able to participate?
The list below is the sponsor’s full registry wording. It can include conditions, prior treatment, test results and other requirements. A match in search does not mean you qualify.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a IGH with tubo-ovarian abscess visible on ultrasound or CT
- Ultrasound abscess\> or equal to 2cm
- Abdominal pain syndrome
- Age 18 to 43 years
- understand french language
- No complicated: good hemodynamic tolerance, not broken
- These patients should be affiliated to the French Social Security and must have given informed participation agreement
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with HIV (CD4 \<200) or co-infections: immunosuppression
- Multi-Abdomen surgery
- Suspected malignant or borderline tumor
- Complicated abscess: rupture of the abscess, peritonitis, septic shock
- Postoperative pelvic abscess
- Patient minor
- During Pregnancy
- Patient having already been accounted for tubo-ovarian abscess in progress
- Not accessible abscess transvaginal puncture
- Patients unable major, patients suffering from mental pathology incompatible with informed consent, refusal to participate
Treatment, groups and participation
The registry may describe treatments and study duration without a complete visit calendar. Ask the study team for the exact schedule, procedures, risks, costs and alternatives. Keep your usual care plan unless your treating clinician tells you otherwise.
- Assignment
- Random assignment
- Masking
- No masking
laparoscopy
the tubo-ovarian abscess should be drained by interventional radiology, preferably by transvaginal or laparoscopic
Procedure: laparoscopic approach
ultrasound-guided puncture
The transvaginal echo guided puncture to replace the first laparoscopy because of its less invasive nature, this is a simple act, fast, possible under mild sedation, the cost is still lower than laparoscopy
Procedure: transvaginal approach
transvaginal approach PROCEDURE
Not reported in this registry record.
laparoscopic approach PROCEDURE
Not reported in this registry record.
What researchers are measuring
Outcome measures describe what is being studied. They are not proof that a treatment works.
Primary measures
Clinical cure rate defined by a composite score as defined by O'Brien PC (Procedures for Comparing samples with multiple endpoints Biometrics 1984; 40: 1079-1087.)
Time frame: at 72 hour
Not reported in this registry record.
Clinical cure rate defined by a composite score as defined by O'Brien PC (Procedures for Comparing samples with multiple endpoints Biometrics 1984; 40: 1079-1087.)
Time frame: at 1 month
Not reported in this registry record.
Clinical improvement
Time frame: at 72 hours and at 1 month
apyrexia to 72 hours and 1 month and EVA to 72 hours and 1 month
Organic improvement
Time frame: at 72 hours and at 1 month
CRP Standards and GB to 72 hours and 1 month if initially high
Secondary measures
Duration of hospital stay
Time frame: at day 0
Not reported in this registry record.
Analgesia Type: general anesthesia versus sedation
Time frame: at day 1
Not reported in this registry record.
recurrent complications
Time frame: at day 1
Per Statement of complications and postoperative and rehospitalization
Operating Time
Time frame: at day 1
Not reported in this registry record.
Fertility prognosis by Mage score
Time frame: at 3 months
Not reported in this registry record.
prognosis of chronic pelvic pain score by adhesions at second look laparoscopy
Time frame: at 3 months
Not reported in this registry record.
Review the complete result tables and limitations in the official record.
Open official results ↗Research locations (1)
The overall study status and a local site’s status can differ. Confirm that location’s availability before traveling.
1 locations
CHU Clermont-FerrandClermont-Ferrand, FranceStatus unknown
Study team and timeline
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
- Study start
- Oct 26, 2016 Actual
- Primary completion
- Feb 4, 2022 Actual
- Study completion
- Sep 4, 2022 Actual
- First posted
- May 25, 2017 Actual
- Last updated
- Nov 9, 2026 Actual
Official study contacts
No central contact is listed. Check the locations and the official record.
Official study title
Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Early of Transvaginal and Laparoscopic Approaches for Drainage of Tubo -Ovarian Abscess. Randomized Noninferiority
Ask Wellness Clinical Research
Your message goes to WCR, including when this study is run by another organization. WCR may offer general guidance but may not operate this trial, have access to its team or be able to enroll you.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Information is submitted by sponsors and investigators. NLM does not approve the safety or science of all listed studies. Registry disclaimer.
Retrieved: Nov 12, 2026 · Last registry update: Nov 9, 2026
