Investigación local. Conexiones humanas. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Volver a buscar estudiosNCT07929558
Aún no reclutaNCT07929558Registro de ClinicalTrials.gov

Abdominal Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Treat Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Chronic SCI

Spinal Cord Injuries (Complete and Incomplete)

LO ESENCIAL

De qué trata este estudio

El registro no identifica actualmente este estudio como reclutando. Consulta su estado antes de planificar una evaluación.

Tipo de estudio
De intervención
Fase
No aplica
Rango de edad
18 años - No especificado
Sexo admitido
Todos los sexos
Voluntarios sanos
No aceptados
Participantes
41 Estimado

Estos son puntos de partida, no una decisión de elegibilidad. El equipo debe revisar todos los requisitos.

Las explicaciones y la navegación están en español. Los textos proporcionados por el registro, incluidos títulos, resúmenes y criterios, se conservan en su idioma original. Puedes pedir orientación en español a WCR.

Acerca de la investigación

Difficulty with bowel movements is one of the most serious side effects of spinal cord injury and one that most severely restricts everyday life. Many people affected take 30 to 60 minutes, or considerably longer, to pass stools. This is accompanied by a significantly slowed bowel transit, which often leads to a feeling of fullness, flatulence and chronic pain. The study investigates a method suitable for everyday use to support bowel function: electrical stimulation of the abdominal muscles. This involves applying adhesive electrodes to the abdomen and controlling them via a small device. The treatment is carried out independently at home - 30 minutes before each planned bowel movement. Two stimulation settings are being compared: i) Motor stimulation: The current strength causes a noticeable contraction of the abdominal muscles. ii) Sensory stimulation: The intensity is lower and is perceived merely as a gentle tingling sensation. The procedure is divided into several phases. Before stimulation begins, baseline values are recorded during a two-week pre-observation phase. Subsequently, both stimulation methods are applied one after the other for 12 weeks each, interspersed with a six-week break without stimulation. Which participant starts with which type of stimulation is determined at random. A final six-week follow-up phase assesses whether any improvements achieved persist after the end of treatment.

During the study, participants will keep a diary and, together with specialists, complete two questionnaires. Bowel transit time will be measured in a simple and safe manner (using maize grains and a capsule containing blue food colouring). In addition, stool samples will be collected at five specified time points to analyse changes in the gut microbiota. The aim is to evaluate a gentle, practical method that facilitates the bowel movement process, promotes gut health and noticeably improves the quality of life of people with spinal cord injury.

Leer la descripción completa

Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) is a debilitating complication affecting the majority of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), resulting from disrupted autonomic and somatic neural pathways regulating colonic peristalsis and sphincter control. Clinically, NBD manifests as prolonged defecation routines, severe constipation, fecal incontinence, and abdominal distension, with approximately 55% of individuals reporting moderate to severe deterioration in quality of life due to restrictive routines, anxiety over accidental episodes, and caregiver dependency. In severe cases, bowel management requires several hours each day and represents a leading source of secondary morbidity and hospital readmission. In addition, prolonged gastrointestinal transit in SCI alters the gut luminal environment, causing mucosal dysbiosis, depletion of beneficial short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa, and accumulation of potentially deleterious proteolytic fermentation metabolites.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied to the abdominal wall musculature is a non-invasive intervention designed to improve bowel function. Historically, abdominal NMES has been applied at suprathreshold intensities to trigger visible tetanic muscle contractions, based on the premise that increased intra-abdominal pressure mechanically facilitates colonic transit and defecation. However, pilot findings and emerging neurophysiological data indicate that sub-motor (sensory) stimulation may independently modulate autonomic enteric pathways via afferent sensory signaling to the spinal cord. In a preliminary single-center pilot trial (NCT04914975, N = 20), daily home-based abdominal NMES applied for 30 minutes prior to scheduled bowel care significantly reduced defecation time and whole-gut transit time. Notably, participants with neurological injury levels below T12 who possessed intact voluntary abdominal motor control also derived clinical benefits, indicating that the underlying mechanisms extend beyond mechanical efferent activation to include sensory afferent neuromodulation.

The ESBo-SCI trial is a randomized, active-controlled, two-period cross-over clinical trial designed to compare the clinical and physiological efficacy of motor-level versus sensory-level abdominal NMES in individuals with chronic SCI. The protocol spans an overall duration of 38 weeks. Following a 2-week standardized baseline phase of prospective documentation without electrical stimulation, participants complete a 12-week intervention period (Stimulation Block I) with either motor NMES or sensory NMES as determined by randomization. This is followed by a 6-week washout phase without electrical stimulation to eliminate potential carry-over effects. Participants then cross over to the alternate stimulation modality for a second 12-week intervention period (Stimulation Block II), concluding with a 6-week follow-up observation phase to determine the durability and persistence of treatment effects. Throughout both 12-week intervention blocks, participants self-administer the stimulation at home for 30 minutes immediately preceding their scheduled bowel routine using certified, current-controlled clinical stimulators. Electrical current intensity is individualized through on-site threshold testing prior to initiating each stimulation block. The motor threshold is defined as the lowest current intensity eliciting a visible muscle twitch within the stimulated area. For the sensory NMES modality, the current amplitude is fixed at 10% below this motor threshold, ensuring activation of cutaneous and subcutaneous sensory afferents without triggering visible muscle contraction. For the motor NMES modality, current amplitude is adjusted above the motor threshold to evoke visible, robust, tetanic abdominal muscle contractions that remain comfortable and tolerable to the participant.

Participants are randomized in a 1:1 allocation to determine the sequence of interventions (motor NMES first versus sensory NMES first).

Laboratory personnel and statisticians remain blinded to treatment sequence and stimulation modality. Participants are masked to the primary study hypotheses and sequence allocation, remaining uninformed regarding which stimulation mode is hypothesized to be superior. The primary hypothesis posits that motor NMES produces a significantly greater reduction in defecation time than sensory NMES, mediated primarily by mechanical intra-abdominal pressure generation combined with efferent motor contractions. The mechanistic hypothesis posits that if sensory NMES yields equivalent or superior clinical improvements, therapeutic benefits will be attributed primarily to afferent somatosensory neuromodulation acting on autonomic spinal and enteric circuits.

A total target enrollment of 41 participants is planned to account for anticipated attrition and provide 33 evaluable participants, ensuring statistical power to detect a clinically meaningful difference in defecation time. Differences between stimulation modalities and study phases will be analyzed using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept for individual participants, treating the first week of each intervention block as an accommodation run-in phase. All prospective participant logs and clinical questionnaires are managed through an encrypted, web-based electronic data capture system using dedicated tablet computers.

¿Quién podría participar?

La lista siguiente contiene el texto del patrocinador. Puede incluir condiciones, tratamientos previos, resultados de pruebas y otros requisitos. Aparecer en tu búsqueda no significa que califiques.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury.
  • Neurological level of injury C1 to L5.
  • American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D.
  • Chronicity ≥1 year post-injury.
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Documented defecation time \>30 minutes per routine with an expressed desire to reduce time spent on bowel care.
  • Established and stable conservative bowel management protocol.
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active chronic inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis).
  • Concurrent regular opioid therapy.
  • Active malignant disease in the abdominal or pelvic region.
  • Patients currently undergoing primary acute rehabilitation.
  • Presence of an implanted sacral anterior root stimulator (Brindley stimulator).
  • Prior surgical diversion of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., colostomy, ileostomy).
  • Pregnancy (confirmed via urine pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential aged 18-49 years).
  • Open skin lesions or active dermatological defects at designated electrode placement sites.
  • Exacerbation of severe autonomic dysreflexia provoked during electrical stimulation testing.
  • Inability to comply with study protocols or operate the device due to substantial cognitive deficits or language barriers.
Entiende la evaluación inicial

Tratamiento, grupos y participación

El registro puede describir tratamientos y duración sin incluir un calendario completo. Pide al equipo las visitas, procedimientos, riesgos, costos y alternativas. Mantén tu atención habitual salvo que tu médico te indique un cambio.

Asignación
Asignación al azar
Enmascaramiento
Enmascaramiento doble
Sensory NMES Modality

Stimulation is delivered via two independent channels using four self-adhesive surface electrodes placed bilaterally across the abdominal wall over the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles. Stimulation is administered with a symmetrical rectangular biphasic current, 40 Hz, 300 µs.

Threshold testing is performed at on-site visits prior to initiating each stimulation block:

Motor Threshold Definition: The lowest electrical current intensity eliciting a visible muscle twitch within the stimulated abdominal area.

In this modality, the sensity modality, the current amplitude is fixed at 10% below the individually determined motor threshold, ensuring activation of cutaneous and subcutaneous sensory afferents without triggering visible muscle contraction.

Participants will stimulate with their individually determined amplitude.

Other: Motor NMES Modality

Motor NMES Modality

Stimulation is delivered via two independent channels using four self-adhesive surface electrodes (5 cm × 9 cm; Axelgaard PALS) placed bilaterally across the abdominal wall over the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles.

Current Type: Symmetrical rectangular biphasic current. Frequency: 40 Hz. Pulse Duration: 300 microseconds (µs). Duty Cycle: 8 seconds ON (incorporating 2 seconds ramp-up and 2 seconds ramp-down) followed by 3 seconds OFF.

In this modality, the motor NMES modality, the current amplitude is adjusted above motor threshold to evoke a visible, robust, tetanic abdominal muscle contraction that remains comfortable and tolerable to the participant.

Participants will stimulate with their individually determined amplitude, that is above the sensory threshold.

Other: Sensory NMES Modality

Sensory NMES Modality OTHER

Stimulation is delivered via two independent channels using four self-adhesive surface electrodes (5 cm × 9 cm; Axelgaard PALS) placed bilaterally across the abdominal wall over the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles.

  • Current Type: Symmetrical rectangular biphasic current.
  • Frequency: 40 Hz.
  • Pulse Duration: 300 µs.

Threshold testing is performed at on-site visits prior to initiating each stimulation block:

  • Motor Threshold Definition: The lowest electrical current intensity eliciting a visible muscle twitch within the stimulated abdominal area.
  • Sensory NMES Modality: Current amplitude is fixed at 10% below the individually determined motor threshold, ensuring activation of cutaneous and subcutaneous sensory afferents without triggering visible muscle contraction.
Motor NMES Modality OTHER

Stimulation is delivered via two independent channels using four self-adhesive surface electrodes (5 cm × 9 cm; Axelgaard PALS) placed bilaterally across the abdominal wall over the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles.

  • Current Type: Symmetrical rectangular biphasic current.
  • Frequency: 40 Hz.
  • Pulse Duration: 300 microseconds (µs).
  • Duty Cycle: 8 seconds ON (incorporating 2 seconds ramp-up and 2 seconds ramp-down) followed by 3 seconds OFF.

Motor NMES Modality: Current amplitude is adjusted above motor threshold to evoke a visible, robust, tetanic abdominal muscle contraction that remains comfortable and tolerable to the participant.

Prepara tus preguntas

Qué evalúan los investigadores

Estas medidas indican qué se estudia. No prueban que un tratamiento funcione.

Medidas principales

Defecation time

Plazo: Defecation time will be assessed with a stool diary over the entire study period of 38 week depending on the bowel movements per week.

Defined as the elapsed duration from the expulsion of the first stool until the expulsion of the last stool. Participants prospectively record precise timestamps for each bowel routine in a daily electronic diary. The primary endpoint is the intra-individual change in mean weekly defecation time between baseline and the two stimulation modalities (excluding the first week of each stimulation block as a run-in phase).

Defecation Time (Minutes)

Plazo: Defecation will be assessed in form of a diary over the entire study period of 38 weeks depending on the number of defecation sessions per week

Defined as the elapsed duration from the expulsion of the first stool until the expulsion of the last stool. Participants prospectively record precise timestamps for each bowel routine in a daily electronic diary. The primary endpoint is the intra-individual change in mean weekly defecation time between baseline and the two stimulation modalities (excluding the first week of each stimulation block as a run-in phase).

Medidas secundarias

Whole-Gut Transit Time (WGTT)

Plazo: The Blue Dye Test will performed 5 times over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Evaluated using a validated home test administered prior to study visits:

Standardized Blue Dye Test: Following an overnight fast (≥8 hours), participants ingest two plain rice crackers and swallow a single 0.68 mL gelatin capsule containing 0.25 g food-grade blue dye powder (\~60 mg combined E131/E132; Hollinger Farbpulver Blau) with \~100 mL water. Diet, activity, and bowel medications remain unchanged, with intensely colored foods avoided for 48 hours. WGTT is defined as the duration between capsule ingestion and the first appearance of blue or blue-green stool.

Whole-Gut Transit Time (WGTT)

Plazo: The Corn Test will performed 5 times over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Evaluated using a validated home test administered prior to study visits:

Corn Test: Ingestion of 140 g of canned sweetcorn; elapsed time to the first visual identification of excreted corn kernels is recorded.

Stool Consistency

Plazo: The BSFS is included in the stool diary and will be filled in at the every defecation time point over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS; range: Type 1 \[separate hard lumps\] to Type 7 \[entirely liquid\]), logged per defecation event

Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) Score

Plazo: The NBD score will be assessed 5 times over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Validated 10-item clinical questionnaire assessing fecal incontinence, constipation, defecation duration, medication dependence, and lifestyle restriction (total score 0 to 47; higher scores indicate greater severity).

Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)

Plazo: The GIQLI will be assessed 5 times over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Total Score Range: 0 to 144 points (derived from 36 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4).

Higher scores indicate a better quality of life, meaning fewer symptoms and better daily functioning.

Disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms, physical functioning, emotional state, social performance, and medical treatment burden.

Gut Microbiome Profiling

Plazo: The Gut Microbiome Profiling consisting of stool probes will be assessed 5 times over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Fecal samples are collected at scheduled visits using ambient-temperature DNA stabilization kits (DNA Genotek) or home frozen at -20°C prior to transport on cold packs and storage at -80°C. Stool aliquots undergo enzymatic pre-lysis and bead-beating prior to silica-membrane DNA purification. Full-length 16S rRNA genes (V1-V9 regions, \~1.5 kb) are amplified (primers 27F/1492R) and sequenced on Oxford Nanopore MinION platforms. Sequences are demultiplexed, filtered (Q ≥ 10; 1,400-1,650 bp), and taxonomically classified against the SILVA 138 database to quantify alpha/beta diversity and relative abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing versus inflammation-associated taxa.

Defecation Diary Metrics-absolut defecation time

Plazo: The diary will be filled in electronically on daily base over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Daily tracking includes time of routine initiation, first stool expulsion, last stool expulsion as the absolute defecation time.

Defecation Diary Metrics-relative defecation time

Plazo: The diary will be filled in electronically on daily base over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Daily tracking includes time of clean-up start and completion to calculate the relative defecation time.

Defecation Diary Metrics-rountinely defecation interventions

Plazo: The diary will be filled in electronically on daily base over the entire study period of 38 weeks.

Daily tracking includes time of individual defecation interventions

Defecation Diary Metrics-stimulation parameter

Plazo: The stimulation parameter will be filled in electronically during the two stimulation periods of 12 weeks each.

The diary includes the stimulation parameter in terms of intensity (amplitude mA)

Defecation Diary Metrics-stimulation time

Plazo: The stimulation parameter will be filled in electronically during the two stimulation periods of 12 weeks each.

The diary includes the stimulation time (minutes)

Defecation Diary Metrics-stimulation posture

Plazo: The stimulation parameter will be filled in electronically during the two stimulation periods of 12 weeks each.

The diary includes participants' posture during stimulation

Nutritional Confounders

Plazo: The Nutritional Confounders will be assessed twice at baseline (day 1) and at study completion (day 1-3, week 38).

Dietary intake is assessed by using the Cambridge Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Lifestyle Confounder frequency of physical activity

Plazo: This Lifestyle Confounder will be assessed twice at baseline (day 1) and at study completion (day 1-3, week 38).

Frequency of weekly physical activity will be documented

Lifestyle Confounder duration of physical activity

Plazo: This Lifestyle Confounder will be assessed twice at baseline (day 1) and at study completion (day 1-3, week 38).

Duration of weekly physical activity will be documented

Lifestyle Confounder type of physical activity

Plazo: This Lifestyle Confounder will be assessed twice at baseline (day 1) and at study completion (day 1-3, week 38).

Type of weekly physical activity will be documented

El registro no indica resultados publicados.

Revisa las tablas completas y sus limitaciones en el registro oficial.

Abrir resultados oficiales ↗

Centros de investigación (3)

El estado general puede diferir del estado de un centro. Confirma la disponibilidad antes de trasladarte.

3 centros

University of AlbertaEdmonton, Alberta, CanadaEstado desconocido
Chester Ho, ProfCONTACTchho@ualberta.ca(780) 492-4388
Dirk Everaert, PhDCONTACTeveraert@ualberta.ca
Chester Ho, ProfSUB_INVESTIGATOR
Ver ubicación en el mapa ↗
Sunnaas Rehabilitation HospitalOslo, Oslo, NorwayEstado desconocido
Thomas Glott, MDCONTACTThomas.Glott@sunnaas.no
Anne Catrine Martinsen, ProfSUB_INVESTIGATOR
Ver ubicación en el mapa ↗
Swiss Paraplegic Center NottwilNottwil, Canton of Lucerne, SwitzerlandEstado desconocido

Equipo y fechas

Patrocinador principal
Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil
Inicio del estudio
1 ene 2027 Estimado
Finalización primaria
31 dic 2030 Estimado
Finalización del estudio
31 dic 2030 Estimado
Primera publicación
10 nov 2026 Real
Última actualización
10 nov 2026 Real

Contactos oficiales del estudio

Título oficial del estudio

ESBo-SCI: Abdominal Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Treat Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Chronic SCI

EL PRÓXIMO PASO, CON APOYO HUMANO

Consulta a Wellness Clinical Research

Tu mensaje va a WCR, incluso si otra organización realiza este estudio. WCR puede orientarte, pero podría no realizar este estudio, tener acceso a su equipo ni poder inscribirte.

No incluyas expedientes médicos, diagnósticos, medicamentos, números de seguro ni otros datos sensibles. Este formulario es para preguntas generales, no para atención urgente.

Enviar una pregunta no te inscribe en un estudio.

Fuente: API v2 de ClinicalTrials.gov. Patrocinadores e investigadores envían la información. La NLM no aprueba la seguridad ni la ciencia de todos los estudios registrados. Aviso del registro.

Consultado: 12 nov 2026 · Última actualización del registro: 10 nov 2026