Cerclage Fixation of Third Fragment in Femoral Shaft Fracture is That Necessary
Femoral Shaft Fracture
De qué trata este estudio
El registro no identifica actualmente este estudio como reclutando. Consulta su estado antes de planificar una evaluación.
- Tipo de estudio
- De intervención
- Fase
- No aplica
- Rango de edad
- 18 años - No especificado
- Sexo admitido
- Todos los sexos
- Voluntarios sanos
- No aceptados
- Participantes
- 42 Real
Estos son puntos de partida, no una decisión de elegibilidad. El equipo debe revisar todos los requisitos.
Las explicaciones y la navegación están en español. Los textos proporcionados por el registro, incluidos títulos, resúmenes y criterios, se conservan en su idioma original. Puedes pedir orientación en español a WCR.
Acerca de la investigación
The aim of this study is to compare closed reduction and intramedullary nailing with open reduction, cerclage fixation of the third fragment and intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures with a third fragment, regarding radiographic healing, operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications, and to explore third-fragment characteristics associated with impaired healing.
Leer la descripción completa
The aim of this study is to compare closed reduction and intramedullary nailing with open reduction, cerclage fixation of the third fragment and intramedullary nailing in skeletally mature patients with femoral shaft fractures containing a third (wedge or butterfly) fragment. Written informed consent was obtained from every patient before enrolment.
Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated sequence with permuted blocks, concealed in sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes opened in the operating theatre after enrolment and anaesthesia. Blinding of surgeons was not possible because the two techniques differ visibly.
Group 1 (Closed group) (21 cases): reduction was performed without opening the fracture site, followed by antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Group 2 (Open group) (21 cases): the fracture site was exposed, the third fragment was reduced with a bone clamp and stabilized with cerclage wiring, followed by antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Preoperative radiographs and, when available, computed tomography were used to measure third-fragment length, width, projected area and displacement. Follow-up radiographs were obtained at approximately six weeks, three months, six months and nine months. Healing was assessed using the Radiographic Union Score for Femur (RUSF) by two independent reviewers. Union was defined as bridging callus across at least three of four cortices with painless full weight bearing, delayed union as failure to achieve union by six months, and nonunion as failure to achieve union by nine months. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, infection and other postoperative complications were recorded.
¿Quién podría participar?
La lista siguiente contiene el texto del patrocinador. Puede incluir condiciones, tratamientos previos, resultados de pruebas y otros requisitos. Aparecer en tu búsqueda no significa que califiques.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Skeletally mature patients
- Recent femoral shaft fracture (within six weeks of injury) without radiographic signs of established union
- Femoral shaft fracture (from 5 cm distal to the lesser trochanter to 9 cm proximal to the knee joint line) with a separate wedge (third) fragment of at least 1 cm(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association \[AO/OTA\] type 32-B)
- Fractures with subtrochanteric or supracondylar extension were eligible
Exclusion Criteria:
- Simple fractures
- Skeletal immaturity
- Revision procedures
- Peri-implant fractures
- Gustilo type III open fractures
- Pathological fractures
- Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up at the study centre
Tratamiento, grupos y participación
El registro puede describir tratamientos y duración sin incluir un calendario completo. Pide al equipo las visitas, procedimientos, riesgos, costos y alternativas. Mantén tu atención habitual salvo que tu médico te indique un cambio.
- Asignación
- Asignación al azar
- Enmascaramiento
- Sin enmascaramiento
Closed reduction group
Procedure: closed reduction and intramedullary nailing. The fracture is reduced without opening the fracture site, followed by antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing; the third fragment is not directly fixed.
Procedure: Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing
Open reduction and cerclage group
Procedure: open reduction, cerclage fixation and intramedullary nailing. The fracture site is exposed, the third fragment is reduced with a bone clamp and stabilized with cerclage wiring, followed by antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Procedure: Open reduction, cerclage fixation and intramedullary nailing
Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing PROCEDURE
Closed reduction without exposure of the fracture site, followed by antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Open reduction, cerclage fixation and intramedullary nailing PROCEDURE
Open exposure of the fracture site with reduction and cerclage wiring of the third fragment, followed by antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Qué evalúan los investigadores
Estas medidas indican qué se estudia. No prueban que un tratamiento funcione.
Medidas principales
Radiographic union rate at six months
Plazo: 6 months postoperatively
Proportion of patients with radiographic union, defined as bridging callus across at least three of four cortices on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs with painless full weight bearing, assessed using the Radiographic Union Score for Femur (RUSF) by two independent reviewers.
Medidas secundarias
Delayed union rate
Plazo: 6 months postoperatively
Proportion of patients who failed to achieve radiographic union by six months.
Nonunion rate
Plazo: 9 months postoperatively
Proportion of patients who failed to achieve radiographic union by nine months
Operative time
Plazo: Intraoperative
Duration of surgery from skin incision to wound closure, in minutes.
Intraoperative blood loss
Plazo: Intraoperative
Estimated intraoperative blood loss, in millilitres.
Postoperative complications
Plazo: Up to 9 months postoperatively
Number of patients with postoperative complications, including surgical site infection.
Discriminative ability of third-fragment projected area for delayed union
Plazo: 9 months postoperatively
Third-fragment projected area (cm²), measured on preoperative imaging, evaluated for its ability to discriminate delayed union using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, reported as the area under the curve (AUC).
Discriminative ability of third-fragment length for nonunion
Plazo: 9 months postoperatively
Third-fragment length (cm), measured on preoperative imaging, evaluated for its ability to discriminate nonunion using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, reported as the area under the curve (AUC).
Discriminative ability of third-fragment displacement for nonunion
Plazo: 9 months postoperatively
Third-fragment displacement (mm), measured on preoperative imaging, evaluated for its ability to discriminate nonunion using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, reported as the area under the curve (AUC).
Revisa las tablas completas y sus limitaciones en el registro oficial.
Abrir resultados oficiales ↗Centros de investigación (0)
El estado general puede diferir del estado de un centro. Confirma la disponibilidad antes de trasladarte.
No hay centros indicados. Usa el contacto oficial del estudio.
Equipo y fechas
- Patrocinador principal
- Ain Shams University
- Inicio del estudio
- 1 dic 2022 Real
- Finalización primaria
- 1 dic 2025 Real
- Finalización del estudio
- 1 dic 2025 Real
- Primera publicación
- 10 nov 2026 Real
- Última actualización
- 10 nov 2026 Real
Contactos oficiales del estudio
No hay un contacto central indicado. Revisa los centros y el registro oficial.
Título oficial del estudio
Cerclage Fixation of Third Fragment in Femoral Shaft Fracture is That Necessary
Consulta a Wellness Clinical Research
Tu mensaje va a WCR, incluso si otra organización realiza este estudio. WCR puede orientarte, pero podría no realizar este estudio, tener acceso a su equipo ni poder inscribirte.
Fuente: API v2 de ClinicalTrials.gov. Patrocinadores e investigadores envían la información. La NLM no aprueba la seguridad ni la ciencia de todos los estudios registrados. Aviso del registro.
Consultado: 12 nov 2026 · Última actualización del registro: 10 nov 2026
