Investigación local. Conexiones humanas. WCR Miami Lakes (786) 483-7856
Volver a buscar estudiosNCT07928960
CompletadoNCT07928960Registro de ClinicalTrials.gov

Conventional or Ultrasound Guided Puncture Technique for the Distal Radial Artery, Direct Comparison Study (Sound Distal Trial).

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

LO ESENCIAL

De qué trata este estudio

El registro no identifica actualmente este estudio como reclutando. Consulta su estado antes de planificar una evaluación.

Tipo de estudio
De intervención
Fase
No aplica
Rango de edad
18 años - No especificado
Sexo admitido
Todos los sexos
Voluntarios sanos
No aceptados
Participantes
600 Real

Estos son puntos de partida, no una decisión de elegibilidad. El equipo debe revisar todos los requisitos.

Las explicaciones y la navegación están en español. Los textos proporcionados por el registro, incluidos títulos, resúmenes y criterios, se conservan en su idioma original. Puedes pedir orientación en español a WCR.

Acerca de la investigación

Over the last few years, a new approach using distal radial access had been employed for a various types of percutaneous interventions. The purpose was to further decrease the rate of vascular complications and proximal radial occlusion (RAO).

The feasibility of distal radial access in several specific groups of patients for conventional, complex coronary and non-coronary procedures was extensively studied and showed a variable rate of success between different operators, using different techniques. The main limitation is the rate of failure in cannulation that is related to the smaller diameter of the distal radial artery and the anatomic variability at the level of access site puncture. One of the solutions advocated by Hadjivassiliou et al. is the use of ultrasound-guided distal transradial acces (dTR)A, which is expected to reduce failure and complication rates.

A recent monocentric, single operator pilot study indicated a lower failure rate with ultrasound than conventional dTRA, without significant differences in puncture time and complication rate between the two approaches.

A specific ultrasound algorithm for distal radial puncture was recently developed and is currently used in our clinical daily practice, showing a 100% rate of success, in a selected group of patients that had favorable anatomic features. Imaging the distal radial artery by ultrasound could potentially be safer, select the proper candidates for this technique and increase the rate of successful cannulation. However, to date, the comparison of feasibility and safety between ultrasound-guided and conventional dTRA has not been reported.

The SOUND Distal trial is a pilot study measuring the reproducibility, rate of success, rate of complications and quality puncture measures.

The primary outcome is comparing the rate of success of dTRA cannulation between conventional and echo guided puncture. Secondary outcomes include quality puncture measures differences between the two approaches regarding patient scale pain/puncture time and number of attempts.

Other secondary end points include technic reproducibility among operators and the total rate of complications for both approaches.

¿Quién podría participar?

La lista siguiente contiene el texto del patrocinador. Puede incluir condiciones, tratamientos previos, resultados de pruebas y otros requisitos. Aparecer en tu búsqueda no significa que califiques.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient older than 18 years requiring diagnostic angiography or PCI.
  • The subject has stable or acute coronary syndrome, or a positive functional study documenting ischemia.
  • The subject is eligible for PCI.
  • The subject is male, or a non-pregnant female.
  • The subject gives consent prior to study inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and/or breast-feeding females.
  • Patients who intend to have a major surgical intervention within 6 months of enrolment in the study at the level of the vascular site access.
  • Patients who previously participated in this study.
  • The subject has suffered a stroke or transient ischemic neurological attack or cerebrovascular accident within the past six months, or has any known intracranial mass, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm or other intracranial pathology.
Entiende la evaluación inicial

Tratamiento, grupos y participación

El registro puede describir tratamientos y duración sin incluir un calendario completo. Pide al equipo las visitas, procedimientos, riesgos, costos y alternativas. Mantén tu atención habitual salvo que tu médico te indique un cambio.

Asignación
Asignación al azar
Enmascaramiento
Sin enmascaramiento
conventional puncture

conventional puncture for TRA cannulation

Procedure: conventional puncture

echo guided puncture

echo guided puncture for TRA cannulation

Procedure: echo guided puncture

echo guided puncture PROCEDURE

echo guided puncture for PCI

conventional puncture PROCEDURE

conventional puncture for PCI

Prepara tus preguntas

Qué evalúan los investigadores

Estas medidas indican qué se estudia. No prueban que un tratamiento funcione.

Medidas principales

first-wiring pass success rate

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

No informado en este registro.

Medidas secundarias

total number of attempts

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

The total number of attempts needed for the first-wiring pass success rate. Attempts will be defined as puncture of the artery, confirmed by the back-bleeding through the needle hub but withdrawal of the needle, after failing the wiring.

time to access

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

The time to access will be measured from the point of the first application of the operator's fingers or US probe to guide access to a successful first-wiring pass success rate. For the blind puncture group: the first application of the operator's fingers on the artery to palpate it.

Bleeding

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

Puncture site bleeding according to EASY criteria and Overall bleeding according to BARC criteria

Successful sheath insertion

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

No informado en este registro.

crossover

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

Crossover to US guidance and/or Access site cross-over

Vascular access-site complication

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

No informado en este registro.

Distal radial artery occlusion

Plazo: from starting procedure to discharge

No informado en este registro.

Hemostasis time

Plazo: from starting procedure to end of procedure

No informado en este registro.

Pain associated with the procedure

Plazo: from starting procedure to discharge

No informado en este registro.

El registro no indica resultados publicados.

Revisa las tablas completas y sus limitaciones en el registro oficial.

Abrir resultados oficiales ↗

Centros de investigación (1)

El estado general puede diferir del estado de un centro. Confirma la disponibilidad antes de trasladarte.

1 centros

CHU HELORA - Hôpital de JolimontLa Louvière, BelgiumEstado desconocido

Equipo y fechas

Patrocinador principal
CHU Helora Jolimont
Inicio del estudio
18 nov 2024 Real
Finalización primaria
1 nov 2026 Real
Finalización del estudio
1 nov 2026 Real
Primera publicación
10 nov 2026 Real
Última actualización
10 nov 2026 Real

Contactos oficiales del estudio

No hay un contacto central indicado. Revisa los centros y el registro oficial.

Título oficial del estudio

Conventional or Ultrasound Guided Puncture Technique for the Distal Radial Artery, Direct Comparison Study (Sound Distal Trial).

EL PRÓXIMO PASO, CON APOYO HUMANO

Consulta a Wellness Clinical Research

Tu mensaje va a WCR, incluso si otra organización realiza este estudio. WCR puede orientarte, pero podría no realizar este estudio, tener acceso a su equipo ni poder inscribirte.

No incluyas expedientes médicos, diagnósticos, medicamentos, números de seguro ni otros datos sensibles. Este formulario es para preguntas generales, no para atención urgente.

Enviar una pregunta no te inscribe en un estudio.

Fuente: API v2 de ClinicalTrials.gov. Patrocinadores e investigadores envían la información. La NLM no aprueba la seguridad ni la ciencia de todos los estudios registrados. Aviso del registro.

Consultado: 12 nov 2026 · Última actualización del registro: 10 nov 2026