Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs After Stroke
Rehabilitation · Stroke
De qué trata este estudio
El registro no identifica actualmente este estudio como reclutando. Consulta su estado antes de planificar una evaluación.
- Tipo de estudio
- De intervención
- Fase
- No aplica
- Rango de edad
- 45 años - 80 años
- Sexo admitido
- Todos los sexos
- Voluntarios sanos
- Aceptados
- Participantes
- 120 Real
Estos son puntos de partida, no una decisión de elegibilidad. El equipo debe revisar todos los requisitos.
Las explicaciones y la navegación están en español. Los textos proporcionados por el registro, incluidos títulos, resúmenes y criterios, se conservan en su idioma original. Puedes pedir orientación en español a WCR.
Acerca de la investigación
The aim of the research will be to evaluate the effects of upper limb rehabilitation using modern Pablo Tyromotion technologies in people after stroke in the late period.
Leer la descripción completa
Prior to the study, an assessment of the reliability, reproducibility and validity of the devices among stroke individuals will be carried out.
The research will be conducted among people who have suffered a stroke in the late period.
The subjects will be allocated, by random selection, to two groups:
The study group will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Pablo Tyromotion device.
The control group will participate in conventional rehabilitation without biofeedback exercises.
Patients will undergo ongoing rehabilitation at the Donum Corde Rehabilitation and Medical Care Center (four weeks). The first examination will be performed on the day of admission, the second on the day of discharge, and the third (control) one month after discharge, during a follow-up visit.
Measurements will be performed three times for all participants:
- assessment of hand and finger muscle strength
- calculated body mass index (BMI)
- proprioceptive testing (mirror test, Thumb Location Test)
- rehabilitation outcome assessment
- functional capacity - Barthel Index, ADL
- Ashworth muscle tone (spasticity)
- hand dexterity using the Box and Blocks test
- hand grip function according to the Frenchay scale
- motor function of the hand and upper limb according to the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity
¿Quién podría participar?
La lista siguiente contiene el texto del patrocinador. Puede incluir condiciones, tratamientos previos, resultados de pruebas y otros requisitos. Aparecer en tu búsqueda no significa que califiques.
Inclusion Criteria:
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- age 45-80 years
- elementary (basic) gripping ability
- degree of paresis of the upper limb and hand 4 -5 on the Brunnström scale
- degree of disability on the Rankin scale 3
- spastic tension of the upper limb, paresis hand not more than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale
- current health condition confirmed by a medical examination, allowing participation in tests and exercises
Exclusion Criteria:
- lack of informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- second or subsequent stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of the brainstem and cerebellum
- disorders of higher mental functions limiting comprehension and carrying out tasks during exercises
- visual field disturbances
- mechanical and thermal injuries that may limit the grasping function of the hand
- concomitant neurological, rheumatological and orthopedic diseases, including permanent - contractures that may affect the grasping ability and locomotion
- unstable medical condition
- failure to complete a 3-week rehabilitation stay
Tratamiento, grupos y participación
El registro puede describir tratamientos y duración sin incluir un calendario completo. Pide al equipo las visitas, procedimientos, riesgos, costos y alternativas. Mantén tu atención habitual salvo que tu médico te indique un cambio.
- Asignación
- Asignación al azar
- Enmascaramiento
- Enmascaramiento triple
Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of devices Pablo Tyromotion among stroke
Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of device Pablo Tyromotion among stroke.
Prior to the study among individuals with stroke, an evaluation of the reliability, repeatability and credibility of the Pablo Tyromotion to be included in the biofeedback rehabilitation.
The evaluation of the Pablo Tyromotion will be carried out by two independent researchers twice.
Study group using Pablo Tyromotion
Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.
In the control group, patients will complete a 3.5-hour daily rehabilitation program. The program will include two hours of individual therapy with a physiotherapist, one hour of verticalization, and 30 minutes of exercises on the Pablo Tyromotion device.
Other: Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.
Control group
In the control group, patients will complete a 3.5-hour daily rehabilitation program. The program will include two hours of individual therapy with a physiotherapist, one hour of verticalization, and 30 minutes of upper limb exercises.
Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. OTHER
Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. The rehabilitation program will last 4 weeks from Monday to Friday.
Qué evalúan los investigadores
Estas medidas indican qué se estudia. No prueban que un tratamiento funcione.
Medidas principales
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Medidas secundarias
Hand grip strength
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg
Hand grip strength
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg
Hand grip strength
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg
pinching strength of the fingers
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg
pinching strength of the fingers
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg
pinching strength of the fingers
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Plazo: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Plazo: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Otras medidas
Assessment of muscle tone (spasticity) was examined with modified Ashworth scale
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Increased muscle tone (spasticity) was examined with modified Ashworth scale. This is a six-point scale modified to include grade 1.
0: No increase in muscle tone
Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Assessment of disability level, using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of disability using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Score Description 0 - No symptoms at all
1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2 - Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3 - Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4 - Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5 - Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6 - Dead TOTAL
Assessment of paretic limb function was assessed using the Brunnström scale
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Motor performance (function) of extremities was assessed using Brunnström scale. This is a six-point scale designed to assess performance (function) of paretic extremities
Body mass index (BMI)
Plazo: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
WHO BMI classification for adults:
\< 18.5 - Underweight (including: \<16.0 starvation, 16.0-16.9 emaciation, 17.0-18.4 underweight) 18.5-24.9 - Normal body weight 25.0-29.9 - Overweight 30.0-34.9 - Class I obesity 35.0-39.9 - Class II obesity (clinical obesity)
≥ 40.0 - Class III obesity (extreme obesity)
Revisa las tablas completas y sus limitaciones en el registro oficial.
Abrir resultados oficiales ↗Centros de investigación (1)
El estado general puede diferir del estado de un centro. Confirma la disponibilidad antes de trasladarte.
1 centros
University of RzeszówRzeszów, PolandEstado desconocido
Equipo y fechas
- Patrocinador principal
- University of Rzeszow
- Inicio del estudio
- 2 mar 2026 Real
- Finalización primaria
- 31 ago 2026 Real
- Finalización del estudio
- 30 sept 2026 Real
- Primera publicación
- 4 mar 2026 Real
- Última actualización
- 10 nov 2026 Real
Contactos oficiales del estudio
No hay un contacto central indicado. Revisa los centros y el registro oficial.
Título oficial del estudio
Evaluation of the Effects of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using the Pablo Tyromotion Device in People After Stroke
Consulta a Wellness Clinical Research
Tu mensaje va a WCR, incluso si otra organización realiza este estudio. WCR puede orientarte, pero podría no realizar este estudio, tener acceso a su equipo ni poder inscribirte.
Fuente: API v2 de ClinicalTrials.gov. Patrocinadores e investigadores envían la información. La NLM no aprueba la seguridad ni la ciencia de todos los estudios registrados. Aviso del registro.
Consultado: 11 nov 2026 · Última actualización del registro: 10 nov 2026
