ReclutandoNCT05706831Registro de ClinicalTrials.gov

Music Intervention and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Neurological Diseases

Disorder of Consciousness · Stroke

Pregúntale a WCR sobre este estudio Registro oficial ↗

LO ESENCIAL

De qué trata este estudio

El registro indica que este estudio recluta participantes. La disponibilidad puede variar por centro.

Tipo de estudio: De intervención
Fase: No aplica
Rango de edad: 18 años - No especificado
Sexo admitido: Todos los sexos
Voluntarios sanos: No aceptados
Participantes: 90 Estimado

Estos son puntos de partida, no una decisión de elegibilidad. El equipo debe revisar todos los requisitos.

Las explicaciones y la navegación están en español. Los textos proporcionados por el registro, incluidos títulos, resúmenes y criterios, se conservan en su idioma original. Puedes pedir orientación en español a WCR.

Acerca de la investigación

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a musical interventionand non-invasive brain stimulation in neurological patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

to evaluate the residual neuroplastic processes in DOC state related to music exposure
to determine the putative modulation of the aforementioned processes and the clinical outcome of DOC patients by non-pharmacological strategies, i.e., electric (tDCS) and music stimulation
to evaluate the impact of this intervention on caregiver's burden and psychological distress.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three different music-listening intervention groups. Primary outcomes will be clinical, that is based on the neurologist's observations of clinical improvement, and neurophysiological, collected pre-intervention, post-intervention and post-placebo.

¿Quién podría participar?

La lista siguiente contiene el texto del patrocinador. Puede incluir condiciones, tratamientos previos, resultados de pruebas y otros requisitos. Aparecer en tu búsqueda no significa que califiques.

Inclusion Criteria:

Age \> 18 years
Post-stroke aphasia
Post-stroke neglect
Patients with disorders of consciusness (DOC)

Exclusion Criteria:

No auditory injury
no hystory of neurological disease
No hystory of psychiatric disease
Previous stroke
use of alcohol and drugs
premorbid dementia

Entiende la evaluación inicial

Tratamiento, grupos y participación

El registro puede describir tratamientos y duración sin incluir un calendario completo. Pide al equipo las visitas, procedimientos, riesgos, costos y alternativas. Mantén tu atención habitual salvo que tu médico te indique un cambio.

Asignación: Asignación al azar
Enmascaramiento: Enmascaramiento doble

Group 1

Group 1 will receive tEs combined with music stimulation for 2 weeks, 1 week of wash out, then sham stimulation combined with noise (placebo) for other 2 weeks.

Other: Combinatory effect of music stimulation and neurostimulation

Group 2

Group 2 will receive sham stimulation and noise (placebo) for the first 2 weeks, then 1 week wash out, and finally tEs and music stimulation for other 2 weeks.

Other: Combinatory effect of music stimulation and neurostimulation

Group 3

Group 3 will receive only music stimulation and sham stimulation for 2 weeks, 1 week of wash out, then sham stimulation and noise (placebo) for another 2 weeks.

Other: Combinatory effect of music stimulation and neurostimulation

Combinatory effect of music stimulation and neurostimulation OTHER

music

Prepara tus preguntas

Qué evalúan los investigadores

Estas medidas indican qué se estudia. No prueban que un tratamiento funcione.

Medidas principales

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Coma Recovery Scale- Revised at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

-Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) - (0-23). High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Disability Rating Scale at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Disability Rating Scale (DRS) - (0-29). High score means a worse outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Rancho Levels of Cognitive Functioning at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Rancho Levels of Cognitive Functioning (LCF) - (1-8). High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended (GOS-E) - (1-8). High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Aachener Aphasie Test at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). This test includes six subtests: spontaneous speech, token test, repetition, written language, naming, and comprehension.

Spontaneous speech is structured in six parts (0-30). High score means a better performance; Token test is composed by 50 items; for the score the number of error id considered (0-50).

Repetition sub test is composed by 50 items; for each item the score range from 0 to 3; high score means better outcome (0-150).

Written language subtest is composed by 30 items; for each item the score range from 0 to 3; high score means better outcome (0-90).

Naming subtest is composed by 40 items; for each item the score range from 0 to 3; high score means better outcome (0-120).

Comprehension subtest is composed by 40 items; for each item the score range from 0 to 3; high score means better outcome (0-120).

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Italian version of Functional Outcome Questionnaire for Aphasie at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Italian version of Functional Outcome Questionnaire for Aphasie (FOQ-A) - (32-160). High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Functional Assessment Measure - Cognitive subscale at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Functional Assessment Measure - Cognitive subscale - (FAM) - (14-98); high score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Quality of Life Questionnaire for aphasics at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Quality of Life questionnaire for Aphasics (QLQA) - (0-148); High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline The semi-structured scale for functional evaluation of personal neglect at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

The semi-structured scale for functional evaluation of personal neglect - (0-9); High score means a worse outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Barrage Test at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Barrage test (0-36). High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Letter cancellation test at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Letter cancellation test - (0-104). High score means a better outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Sentence reading test at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Sentence reading test (0-6). High score means a worse outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline Wundt-Jastrow area illusion test at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Wundt-Jastrow area illusion test (0-20). High score means a worse outcome.

Neuropsychological outcomes

Plazo: Change from baseline The semi structured scale for the functional evaluation of extrapersonal neglect at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

The semi structured scale for the functional evaluation of extrapersonal neglect (0-9). High score means a worse outcome.

Neurophysiological outcome

Plazo: Change from baseline oscillation at 2 weeks and 4 weeks

The ratio of fast (8-30 Hz, α-β) to slow (2-8 Hz, δ-θ) oscillation amplitude at the midline electrodes (Fz, Cz, Pz, Oz) will be measured and compared pre- and post intervention."