Effectiveness of the Educator Well-being Program
Participatory Action Research · Occupational Health · Educator Well-being · Employee Health
De qué trata este estudio
El registro no identifica actualmente este estudio como reclutando. Consulta su estado antes de planificar una evaluación.
- Tipo de estudio
- De intervención
- Fase
- No aplica
- Rango de edad
- 18 años - No especificado
- Sexo admitido
- Todos los sexos
- Voluntarios sanos
- Aceptados
- Participantes
- 4000 Estimado
Estos son puntos de partida, no una decisión de elegibilidad. El equipo debe revisar todos los requisitos.
Las explicaciones y la navegación están en español. Los textos proporcionados por el registro, incluidos títulos, resúmenes y criterios, se conservan en su idioma original. Puedes pedir orientación en español a WCR.
Acerca de la investigación
Using a stepped wedge design (prospective cohort with concurrent controls) among six paired, elementary schools, investigators will implement and evaluate the Educator Well-being Program. The investigators will evaluate whether the process improves organizational-level factors, teacher mental well-being (stress, depression and anxiety symptoms).
¿Quién podría participar?
La lista siguiente contiene el texto del patrocinador. Puede incluir condiciones, tratamientos previos, resultados de pruebas y otros requisitos. Aparecer en tu búsqueda no significa que califiques.
Inclusion Criteria:
- All staff aged 18 years or older at the time of survey administration within the three school districts will be eligible for participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None.
Tratamiento, grupos y participación
El registro puede describir tratamientos y duración sin incluir un calendario completo. Pide al equipo las visitas, procedimientos, riesgos, costos y alternativas. Mantén tu atención habitual salvo que tu médico te indique un cambio.
- Asignación
- Asignación al azar
- Enmascaramiento
- Sin enmascaramiento
Educator Well-being Program
Staff at participating schools will experience the Educator Well-being Program process and complete pre- and post-intervention survey.
Behavioral: Healthy Workplace Participatory Program
Delayed Intervention
Status quo program remains in place with new ongoing data collection, then experimental intervention as above.
Behavioral: Healthy Workplace Participatory Program
Healthy Workplace Participatory Program BEHAVIORAL
The Center for the Promotion of Health in the New England Workplace's (CPH-NEW's) Healthy Workplace Participatory Program (HWPP) is a participatory process in which end-users design TWH interventions that simultaneously change organizational and individual behavior to improve the health, safety and well-being of their workforce. The HWPP uses a process to empower workers to identify the root causes of health and safety concerns and then design, implement and evaluate interventions to address those problems. The Total Teacher Health Project adapted the HWPP for educators and refer to it as the Educator Well-being Program.
Qué evalúan los investigadores
Estas medidas indican qué se estudia. No prueban que un tratamiento funcione.
Medidas principales
Work Stress
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 1 question related to stress. The score ranges from 1-10, where higher scores indicate more stress.
Perceived Stress
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 10 items from the Perceived Stress Scale. A summary score is created with score ranges from 0-40, where higher scores indicate more stress.
Anxiety Symptoms
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 7 items from the GAD-7. A summary score is created and scores range from 0-21, where higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
Depression Symptoms
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later
The "All-Employee Survey Educator" includes 10 from the CES-D. A summary score is created by summing items score ranges from 0-30, where higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms.
Well-being
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 2 items adapted from the SF-36. One item assesses physical health, the other mental health with both on a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) A summary score is created by averaging the two items with a range from 1-5, where higher scores indicate better well-being.
Burnout (Emotional Exhaustion)
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 9 items from Maslach Burnout Inventory for Educators. A summary score is created by summing the nine items, after reverse coding as required, with a range from 0-54, where higher scores indicate higher burnout.
Burnout (Personal Accomplishment)
Plazo: Frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 8 items from Maslach Burnout Inventory for Educators. A summary score is created by summing the nine items, after reverse coding as required, with a range from 0-48, where lower scores indicate higher burnout.
Burnout (Depersonalization)
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 5 items from Maslach Burnout Inventory for Educators. A summary score is created by summing the nine items, after reverse coding as required, with a range from 0-30, where higher scores indicate higher burnout.
Work-life conflict
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 1 item on work-life conflict. The item is assessed on a scale from 1 to 5 (strongly disagree to strongly agree) where higher scores indicate higher work-life conflict.
Intention to Turnover
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later
The "All-Employee Survey for Educators" includes 2 items to assess turnover intention. The items are assessed on a scale from 1 to 5 (strongly disagree to strongly agree) and averaged where higher scores indicate higher intent to turnover.
Medidas secundarias
Change in Team Attendance
Plazo: Through study completion, an average of two years
Attendance for each Educator Design Team meeting (1-4 times per month)
Change in Team Engagement
Plazo: Through study completion, an average of two years
Percentage of combined agree and strongly agree responses for 1 survey item collected following Educator Design Team meetings (1-4 times per month): "The discussion was meaningful for achieving health, safety, and well-being goals." (Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree, Not Applicable). Items are computed individually.
Change in Level of Committee Activity
Plazo: Through study completion, an average of two years
A qualitative summary of field notes collected by research personnel following Educator Design Team and Administrator Team meetings (1-4 times per month) over the course of the study.
Change in team-selected health/safety/well-being issue
Plazo: Through study completion, an average of two years
Targeted pre- and post-intervention surveys will be designed and administered by the Educator Design Team
Proportion of content followed according to the Educator Well-being Program protocol
Plazo: Through study completion, an average of two years
A process measure that will be determined by adherence to Educator Well-being Program protocol and pre-designed agendas for Educator Design Team meetings (1-4 times per month)
Supportive School Climate
Plazo: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later
The "All-Employee Survey Educator" includes 6 from the School Climate sub-scale for staff connection. A summary score is created by averaging the items with score ranges from 1-4, where higher scores indicate a greater more supportive school climate.
Revisa las tablas completas y sus limitaciones en el registro oficial.
Abrir resultados oficiales ↗Centros de investigación (1)
El estado general puede diferir del estado de un centro. Confirma la disponibilidad antes de trasladarte.
1 centros
UConn HealthFarmington, Connecticut, United StatesEstado desconocido
Equipo y fechas
- Patrocinador principal
- UConn Health
- Inicio del estudio
- 9 nov 2022 Real
- Finalización primaria
- 2027-06 Estimado
- Finalización del estudio
- 2027-08 Estimado
- Primera publicación
- 8 dic 2022 Real
- Última actualización
- 10 nov 2026 Real
Contactos oficiales del estudio
No hay un contacto central indicado. Revisa los centros y el registro oficial.
Título oficial del estudio
CPH-NEW IV - Total Worker Health - Total Teacher Health
Consulta a Wellness Clinical Research
Tu mensaje va a WCR, incluso si otra organización realiza este estudio. WCR puede orientarte, pero podría no realizar este estudio, tener acceso a su equipo ni poder inscribirte.
Fuente: API v2 de ClinicalTrials.gov. Patrocinadores e investigadores envían la información. La NLM no aprueba la seguridad ni la ciencia de todos los estudios registrados. Aviso del registro.
Consultado: 11 nov 2026 · Última actualización del registro: 10 nov 2026
